FACING THE TRUTH

DON’T BURY YOUR HEAD OR HIDE AWAY.

Here are some facts

  1. Alex Salmond was falsely accused with multiple charges being made against him.
  2. Long before any trial the “charges” were maliciously leaked to a newspaper.
  3. This led to a media frenzy that championed the multi charges from so many different women as evidence there was no hope of acquittal.
  4. Throughout the trial media reports were extremely hostile largely reporting the prosecution evidence while ignoring the defence evidence that effectively destroyed the prosecution case.
  5. During the trial Mr Salmond’s defence team tried to lodge a number of WhatsApp messages that they argued proved a clearly planned conspiracy against him. The judge did not permit them to be lodged.
  6. The trial ended with every single charge being thrown out by a jury comprised of more women than men. Not a single charge was upheld.
  7. Much of the prosecution case was shown up as patently false or contrived.
  8. Shortly after the trial those responsible for the rejected allegations signed a press release that continued their smear campaign against the man who had just been cleared of every single charge
  9. The BBC in the form of an hour long documentary then produced a programme called “the Trial of Alex Salmond” that repeated all the allegations, had interviews with the “victims” using actor’s voices and pictures of nervous twitching all for effect, YET MANAGED TO OMIT THE ENTIRE DEFENCE CASE, EVERY SINGLE DEFENCE WITNESS WAS IGNORED. It was aired multiple times.
  10. Last week one of those WhatsApp messages were leaked and it was revealed that the SNP Chief Executive was actively encouraging pressure to be applied on the police and to open up more allegations through the Met in London. I am led to believe there are more WhatsApp messages from this closed group which provide much more evidence of the plot and those involved.
  11. It is already known from numerous press reports that a number of the allegations were made by senior members of the SNP and Scottish Government.
  12. Craig Murray, who reported the trial honestly and accurately, unlike the MSM who continued to try and paint Alex Salmond guilty, is facing contempt of court charges despite doing considerably less to reveal the identities of the alphabet women than was possible from the reports in many of the mainstream publications

This section that follows is not all facts but includes opinion based on the information I have.

WHY? IS A QUESTION ASKED BY MANY.

Political patronage can be lucrative. Any leader of any Government has the opportunity to move into their administration many positions in both Government and Party to  their closest allies and friends. These positions, both paid and unpaid are largely reliant on the leader staying in place. 

Now, if the people concerned have true talent they probably could survive a change of leader, but, it is much safer to them if any potential contenders can be kept well away from the centre of power. I fear that is what we are dealing with here with the malicious attempts to kill off Alex Salmond and keeping Joanna Cherry out of Holyrood. I do think they are both connected to the same fear. Likewise control of the NEC is part of the same problem.

BUT WHAT BROUGHT THIS ON?

I am told it was brought on by the incident involving Mark MacDonald where he retweeted a message he should not have done and a bandwagon developed calling for him to resign his seat. There was a great fear that Alex Salmond would view such a by election as an opportunity to re enter Holyrood. Two things happened at this stage, the first allegations against Alex Salmond emerged. I believe it likely this was to only to stop him becoming a candidate but it was also accompanied with an easing back on the Mark McDonald situation where there were no more calls for him to resign his seat, merely to lose the whip. So no by election, he could stay to the next election with his seat being probably based on a future all women shortlist if necessary.. Problem solved.

The CONSEQUENCES

For Alex Salmond if he had been found guilty he could easily, at his age, been facing a prison sentence that could have seen him spending the rest of his natural life in jail. Think about that. Then think of the enormous pain and suffering he suffered over almost two years knowing he was innocent but still knowing his freedom was entirely dependent on a jury believing him innocent. The more so that the jury for that very extended period were subject to the same hostile commentary coming from the MSM in advance of the trial. Commentary designed to influence opinion. Look how many supposedly loyal SNP people were influenced to accept his guilt. Often the same people today who complain and whine when efforts are being made to encourage the Party to take action against those involved in this plotting.

IN CONCLUSION

I have known Alex Salmond for thirty five years. We are not close. I sent him a message of support in advance of his trial and contributed to his defence fund. I am friendly with a good number of MP’s and MSP’s and some of what I have written above comes from these sources. None of the above is single source information.

I hope this matter can be dealt with speedily. I have been calling for a Party Enquiry from the end of the trial. Perhaps last week’s revelation of the Chief Executive’s enthusiasm for pushing the charges against Alex Salmond is the explanation of why it has never happened. I remember swift action in the past.

I suspect this started as a silly plot, but having succeeded in heading off the threat in Mark McDonald’s seat, some bright spark, thinking of the various selection battles arising in the lead up to the May 2021 decided they should administer the coup de grace with the creation of more malicious charges which spiraled out of control and resulted in such damage to Alex Salmond, despite his innocence, and which will ultimately result in a lot more humiliation and disaster for those responsible as the truth about these events becomes increasingly apparent. More and more people know the identities so this is inevitable.

You will note this article does not suggest any MI5 or Westminster involvement in this debacle. I do not rule it out but if there is I am unaware of it. What I do see and find utterly despicable is the cooperation between those who created the false allegations and the Unionist media who have been delighted to use these gifts to smear a man who was, and still is, the greatest threat to the Union. That has been betrayal with a capital B and they should be ashamed of themselves and certainly holding no office within the SNP or Scottish Government. It is just ridiculous that those seeking justice on this matter have to suffer accusations of being disloyal and disruptive from the same folk who are willing to overlook the actions of those who created these disgraceful and vindictive events. Has the World gone mad?

I desperately want Independence. I never created the false narrative, I never leaked the charges to the media, I never conspired with others to endanger the freedom of an innocent man, or who continued to run an organised smear campaign against him once the charges were all dismissed. All done from hiding.

Think about this, if people see you trying to bury such wrongdoing, prepared to let it go, they are going to ask what else is being hidden in our drive for Independence? It would be an effective attack that we can’t defend and would cost us dear. You simply can’t call for a fair and just Scotland and then turn a blind eye to this. It won’t work, but more important it is just so wrong.

So if you are angry at all this and you would be right to be so, restrict it to those responsible. Being seen to tolerate and condone this sort of evil plotting, cowardly and devious behavior is not the route to a free, just and prosperous Scotland. We are a better people than that and our leadership needs to reflect that honesty and decency to inspire our people, or else all will be lost….and will deserve to be. It’s a better, honest and just Scotland we are fighting for! Let’s not forget that and lead with the high standards Scotland deserves.

I am, as always

Yours for Scotland

If you value this article why not take out a free subscription on either the .home or blog pages of this website? You will be very welcome.

STOP PRESS


FROM ALEX’S LONGTERM OFFICE MANAGER.

Isobel Zambonini
Isobel Zambonini Iain Lawson I cannot thank you enough for writing this piece, every word clear and succinct. I have kept my council very close as expected as I have been involved in the legalities since the judicial review days but you have hit the nail very firmly on the head. Thanks again.

YOURSFORSCOTLAND.COM

11 thoughts on “FACING THE TRUTH

  1. ‘So if you are angry at all this and you would be right to be so, restrict it to those responsible. ‘
    Who’s responsible?
    ‘Look how many supposedly loyal SNP people were influenced to accept his guilt. Often the same people today who complain and whine when efforts are being made to encourage the Party to take action against those involved in this plotting.’
    Who are they? Name them, and let’s end the filthy war they’ve started.
    ‘I hope this matter can be dealt with speedily.’ Are you serious? This isn’t a dispute over some lost paving stones.

    Forgive me, Iain, but this reads like “Let’s not agitate against the leadership of the SNP” surely it is the leadership where responsibility lies? Where does the buck stop?
    The Chief Executive – who’s shown enthusiasm for pushing the charges against Alex Salmond – happens to be married to the most powerful individual in the independence movement; are you suggesting she doesn’t have the power to kick out the ‘dead wood’ and to get the Party back on track? I’d wager Salmond would have no such problems?
    I suggest the ship containing the power to end the crap currently splitting a once great party has sailed.

    Apart from all that, where’s our referendum? Doesn’t this Party do any of that campaigning stuff? That’s another matter that can’t be dealt with speedily.
    Seeing as Scottish independence is as far away as Timbuktu, let’s call a spade a spade and let’s see who’s on whose side. The more we pussy-foot around these bastards, the further away our Country’s right.

    A wee bit more fighting talk, Iain, cheers.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. I posted this on Wings Over Scotland as a response to someone who was upset that SC was posting exposure of what is currently going on

    twathater says:
    21 September, 2020 at 5:39 pm

    Jules and others who feel disheartened at the multiple revelations coming out NOT rapidly enough I GENUINELY and SINCERELY ask who do you BLAME for your displeasure and disappointment

    Do you BLAME Stuart Campbell whose renowned forensic investigative prowess is acclaimed by ALL of us when it is directed at unionist LIES and CORRUPTION
    Or

    Do you BLAME the EVIL,AMORAL,UNCARING people (for that is what they are) who are and have done inhumane things to an innocent man, his wife , family and friends, the worry, stress and mental anguish NOT to mention the financial burden this has placed on a 65 year old man and his 83 year old wife is immeasurable

    ALL this lying and obfuscation by people who WE have entrusted with our DREAMS and ASPIRATIONS, to govern us with honesty and integrity and are now being exposed as nothing but pathological psychopaths who will stop at NOTHING to remain in power

    I personally want every piece of lies and corruption exposed and the perpetrators removed from any responsibility for Scotland , because Scotland the country and the people DESERVE BETTER than this evil shower

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Thank you for this. Regretfully I had to remove two posts from a regular and valued contributor to this site because his comments, clearly made in real anger went too far, in my opinion. I much prefer your controlled comment as it is more effective in pushing your argument.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Thank you Iain Lawson. I agree with everything that you and Twathater have written.

    I have been a member of the SNP for over 30 years. I never thought it would stoop to such levels of depravity.

    It is clear that those who opposed the Holyrood + Referendum approach and its propensity to be corrupted by power, were absolutely correct. Power has clearly corrupted, and brought into the party and regrettably, government, people with absolutely no intention of driving for independence.

    The next Scottish election needs to be a vote on independenc and only independence pure and simple, because we cannot trust the corrupt cabal presently at the top, and ought not to allow them to benefit from their corruption. An election win in these circumstances means we dissolve the union.

    It’s comin yet for a’ that.

    Liked by 4 people

  4. Thank you.

    A very succinct summation of the events which everyone in Scotland should be grateful for, at the very least,if only for reference.

    I’ll also take the opportunity to thank you for your appearance on Barrhead boy’s podcast.

    It was both entertaining, enlightening and engaging. I found the penultimate ‘e’, (encouraging) through your enthusiasm ((e squared) (there goes another ‘e’)) for a Scotland with differences.
    Without that spirit,there is no point.

    I found a few difficulties in what you said, but a true debate can only happen in an independent nation, fully in control of its bounty.

    Common purpose (a combination of words abused by the worst of our political enemies) can make productive friends.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. “I am told it was brought on by the incident involving Mark MacDonald where he retweeted a message he should not have done and a bandwagon developed calling for him to resign his seat.”

    I feel like this utter misrepresentation of a story very clearly reported speaks volumes to your credibility.

    Mark did not retweet a message he should not have done. He messaged a staffer who he’d been making feel uncomfortable in a harass-type way saying that he’d just about texted her talking about being “fingered”.

    This was widely reported alongside a number of other substantiated allegations of harassment towards staff.

    Your inventing of a medium where this did not take place — and claim to have this evidenced by multiple sources — does not feel me with confidence in your conspiracy theory.

    “Now, if the people concerned have true talent they probably could survive a change of leader, but, it is much safer to them if any potential contenders can be kept well away from the centre of power.”

    Could surely the same not be said of those close to Salmond following his loss of power and subsequent admission of sexual misdemeanours? Couldn’t it be that this is concocted on speculation and innuendo by his friends and acolytes?

    Like

    1. Alexander, if you’re compelled to attack the blogger re accuracy and facts, I suggest you come armed with the actual facts before doing so.

      It’s common knowledge that Mark McDonald was the victim of predictive text, when his intentioned ‘dingied’ was replaced by the accidental term – a modern anomaly we’ve all fallen victim to – but which cost McDonald his career and reputation. Texts and Whatsapp messages have a habit of confusing and tripping folk up*
      Whilst not defending McDonald, it should be noted that an investigation concluded that the allegations from a third woman, who accused him of “inappropriate physical contact” at a social event, could not be substantiated. Your rant therefore of ‘a number of other substantiated allegations’ amounts to one more instance, excluding the error of predictive text.

      *Perhaps you’ll mention Peter Murrell in your next blog contribution?

      Personally, I find it somewhat disturbing that, while McDonald lost his career over a predictive text error and – rightly – over another incident, the person most calling for the MSPs head – Nicola Sturgeon – remains in power despite knowingly lying to Parliament?
      Please feel free to come back and defend that one when it takes place – as take place it will, Alex

      Goodness me: I managed to include both the First Minister and her husband in one reply!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: