Crucial warning from our Welsh friends. This really matters! My thanks to Sara Salyers for sharing this.
MIA COMMENTS ON THE ABOVE
Oh, I am so angry.
This speech, if I am not mistaken, took place before the Withdrawal bill was passed in December 2019. What I find unconceivable (and disgusting, quite frankly) is that if Mr Carwyn Jones, being a labour man (unionist by default), was wide awake and not caught off guard when recognising this, he was able to actually see how this would clash with Scotland’s constitutional convention and how this would cut right across the Treaty of Union, and had the balls to shout it, so should have done Sturgeon, and the brigade of amoebas that call themselves SNP MPs and MSPs.
So why didn’t they cause a constitutional mayhem about this and stop the Brexit process on its tracks right there and then?
Because they did not want to. Stopping brexit was never their intention and, by the look of it, they don’t give a rat’s arse about Scotland’s constitution and Scotland’s rights through the treaty of union.
While Mr Carwyn Jones denounced this assault, publicly, what did Sturgeon and the SNP amoebas do? Nothing. Not a thing, so the bill passed with no problems. One hell of a fighter we have on the side of Scotland, huh? I wish we could swap Mr Carwyn Jones for the hopeless Sturgeon.
In my view they had in their hands two opportunities not mutually exclusive to stop brexit and to end the union:
1. To terminate the treaty of union on the basis of the direct constitutional assault of England MPs on Scotland and their encroachment in our constitution
2. To immediately invoke Article 46 of the Vienna Convention to stop the Withdrawal bill and treaty of the EU with the UK regarding brexit
Yet, the SNP amoebas did none. And in doing nothing and letting it pass, they might have activated clause b of Article 45 of the Vienna convention (Loss of a right to invoke a ground for invalidating, terminating, withdrawing from or suspending the operation of a treaty), which says:
“A State may no longer invoke a ground for invalidating, terminating, withdrawing from or
suspending the operation of a treaty under articles 46 to 50 or articles 60 and 62 if, after becoming aware
of the facts:
(a) it shall have expressly agreed that the treaty is valid or remains in force or continues in operation,
as the case may be; or
(b) it must by reason of its conduct be considered as having acquiesced in the validity of the treaty or in its maintenance in force or in operation, as the case may be”
Mr Carwyn Jones said that he left this for the Scots to fight. I wish we had him as FM instead of the compliant debutant passing for Scotland’s FM we are currently discredited with. Did those who were elected to represent us and acting under Sturgeon’s command even attempt to seriously fight this other than giving it a bit of lip service?
The cowards didn’t even bat an eyelid. They should refused to take the Westminster seats while this bill was debated and voted, to signal that such parliament had no legitimacy to pass that bill on behalf of Scotland. Instead, they glued their backsides to the seats even more, took part in the vote and let that withdrawal bill pass “on our behalf”, imposing on us, “on our behalf” “Westminster’s parliamentary sovereignty” without remorse.
And are we supposed to thank “the leader” and her SNP amoebas for this astonishing betrayal? I think not.
The timeline of things is always fascinating, isn’t it? This bill was introduced on the 19 December 2019. That is just ONE week after the GE2019 where Scotland sent the last absolute majorities of SNP MPs and where Sturgeon pontificated about a vote for the SNP being a vote for Scotland to have a choice. A hell of a choice this woman is going to give Scotland when she has let England MPs encroach in each and every one of our rights, our assets and our constitution, huh?
And this bill was, of course, conveniently passed right before Sturgeon’s infamous capitulation speech just over a month later, where she promptly obliged to the new imposition of Westminster’s sovereignty. How accommodating. It is a shame that when some Spad or spin doctor wrote the speech for her it did not occur to them that she was expected to deliver he speech on behalf of Scotland and not just on Sturgeon and the Spad’s/spin doctor’s behalf. Scotland never agreed to let England MPs encroach on our constitution. So what right did she have to let it happen?
But there is something else, If I am not mistaken, and I am happy to be corrected, Mr Keatings sought his advice from counsel before to start the Section 30 case BEFORE this withdrawal bill had been introduced. How much did this bill determine the ruling of the case against Mr Keatings?
Undermining our constitution without our consent is just one of the many “favours” this useless “leader” has done for us. And the withdrawal bill is just one of many opportunities to legitimately terminate this union that this political fraud has let pass us by. She is, without a shadow of a doubt, the best weapon unionists could ever dream of to forever stop Scotland’s independence.
BEAT THE CENSORS
Sadly some sites had given up on being pro Indy sites and have decided to become merely pro SNP sites where any criticism of the Party Leader or opposition to the latest policy extremes, results in censorship being applied. This, in the rather over optimistic belief that this will suppress public discussion on such topics. My regular readers have expertly worked out that by regularly sharing articles on this site defeats that censorship and makes it all rather pointless. I really do appreciate such support and free speech in Scotland is remaining unaffected by their juvenile censorship. Indeed it is has become a symptom of weakness and guilt. Quite encouraging really.
Are available easily by clicking on the links in the Home and Blog sections of this website. by doing so you will be joining thousands of other readers who enjoy being notified by email when new articles are published. You will be most welcome.