I published the article below before last year’s SNP Conference. I have several new articles coming in the lead up to the 2022 Conference but in view of the latest moves to recreate a very different National Council to the democratic and balanced body that existed in the past and the move to give every Tom, Dick and Harry affiliate group 6 places each but other controls and appointed places for others means the ordinary membership is once again facing being swallowed up by the payroll vote and these affiliate allies whose existence is entirely dependent on supporting every wacky policy of the Woke. I will publish a new article on this in the next couple of weeks but this can serve as a reminder of the past until then.

With the SNP CONFERENCE looming in a matter of weeks I thought it might be a good idea to rerun an earlier article published a while back that looked at some of the problems and how they had been “created”. Have a read and then ask is there any evidence, that the current SNP LEADERSHIP have taken any steps to rectify them or have things got worse?


It should not be easy to do. It represents a huge risk to democracy if it is allowed to happen. Particularly if it is a Party of Government.

Here in Scotland we have seen it happen over the course of a few years. The Scottish National Party, a well established Party with a record of exemplary democracy in its long history and justifiably regarded as having one of the most open and Democratic systems of internal organisation and operation has witnessed a ruthless and unfaltering series of “internal reforms” , which has distanced the control the ordinary members and branches previously exercised in its decades of operation.

The impact of these “reforms” have already been disastrous, leading to thousands of members leaving and the creation of several new rival parties aligned to the policy of Independence for Scotland. The impetus for this being directly associated with other issues, promoted by minority groups who were the big winners in the “reforms” grabbing control of the Party’s ruling body, the National Executive Committee (NEC).

This control of the NEC was accompanied with the removal of the Party’s National Council which was the crucial quarterly meetings where delegates from the branches met to question office bearers and to openly discuss various policy and tactical matters. By getting rid of National Council accountability in the Party was effectively ended, leading to a much more authoritarian leadership who have felt free to impose policy. Policies of their choice not the Party.

Examples of this are GRA, HATE CRIME BILL etc which are described as SNP Policy but which have never been discussed or voted on at any Party Conference, the ultimate policy decision body in the Party. Worse, issues that were debated and passed at Conference on issues like currency and maritime policy development have been ignored simply because they were decisions a handful of people at the top of the Party did not support. The leadership just ignored the votes as if they had never happened.This would have been impossible to happen before these “reforms”

The “Missing” Money

Organisation has also been ruthlessly amended to the detriment of accountability. Concerns were correctly voiced about the missing £600k that was raised from members and non members alike. At first it was denied that it had been spent, members got letters explaining it was “woven through the accounts”.The National Treasurer responsible for that letter was judged at the subsequent Party Conference election and he was replaced as National Treasurer by Douglas Chapman MP who was elected by delegates on the promise of discovering the whereabouts of that money then advising the membership of the truth of the matter. This did not go well, when he requested sight of the full accounts on behalf of his Audit Committee, the Chief Executive Officer, Peter Murrell, the husband of the current leader, refused to let him see them. This despite his clear mandate from the Party Membership for him to do so. When it became clear nobody was going to tackle Murrell over this Douglas, plus three others on his audit committee resigned on the basis he was not being given access to the information he and his committee required to carry out the tasks. SHORTLY THEREAFTER THE PREVIOUS TREASURER, WHO HAD BEEN REJECTED BY CONFERENCE WAS REAPPOINTED, MINUS THE REQUIREMENT OF ANY ELECTION. The recent secret Governance Report, of which more later, suggested Party officials I.e. Mr Murrell were more suited and able to maintain the accounts that any elected Treasurer, what’s more it set strict conditions on who could sit on any Audit Committee insisting on NEC oversight of membership and a condition that any committee contained a majority of NEC members. Pretty much guarantees an “innocent verdict” if investigating the financial management of the NEC!


Earlier this year I was leaked, from several sources, a copy of the Governance Report which were the planned future “reforms”, initially scheduled to be implemented at this Conference however the furore raised by my article and some mrmbers reaction to it, resulted in the leadership taking fright and relegating it to a sub committee for further discussion. Note, it has not been ditched, just delayed. Clearly with the current unrest and dissatisfaction in the Party now is not the time to be further relegating members input and handing even more control to the Woke faction on the NEC, INCREASING their unelected numbers while HALVING the number of elected area representatives across the country.

The political influence of the Woke faction led to highly irresponsible actions, like ignoring legal advice and fiddling the list rankings for the SNP across Scotland that ensured placing Woke candidates in the number one slot in every region in Scotland. It passed the NEC on the Woke chairperson’s casting vote. It was a tactic designed to get rid of one person, the very popular MSP and best supported MSP in the Borders region Joan McAlpine, who was guilty of supporting women’s rights. The “ election results” that determined these placings were never made public. The legal advice warned to do this could lay the Party liable for “damages” amounting to a six figure plus amount if someone affected in the way it happened to Joan McAlpine chose to sue the Party for damages. Knowing the state of the Party finances this was a very big consideration for those NEC members who had assets, like owning their own homes  which would be vulnerable if the Party lost any expensive court case and NEC members became personally responsible for the debt. I know, for certain, that this was a big consideration for some of the NEC members who resigned shortly thereafter and who can blame them?  It was clear to them they were on a reckless committee that had no compunction in endangering the wellbeing of the other committee members. The legal advice suggested the Party would be likely to lose, so they should all be grateful that Joan McAlpine did not choose to take the matter further.

The amount of bullying and intimidation on the NEC was ridiculous and completely ignored (supported) by the Party leadership. There was a very good reason for this. At the previous Conference there had been a reaction to the Woke takeover and several of their leading members lost their elected positions. There was a successful campaign, headed the “good guys”, which promoted non Woke male and female candidates which commenced the minute the nominations were published in advance of the Conference. Leadership favourites took a trouncing so their surviving unelected Allies on the NEC made life very difficult for those that were elected in their place. This resulted in several of them leaving and joining Alba and surprise, surprise those leadership favourite candidates, who were beaten for the positions in the full Party Elections the previous year, were reappointed to their previous positions, just like the replacement National Treasurer, all without the need for  any election!. The favoured few eh?


That is enough background let’s get down to the nitty gritty what is happening now and who are these people who hold such power and how did they get there?

Well let’s start with the Conference and Annual Elections due later this week. The leadership have determined there will be no “good guys” campaign this time. How is this achieved? Well you don’t know whose standing yet, do you? As I write this we are days away from the Conference but the names of the candidates are only going to be released in the Conference Handbook, unlike previous years where this information was available well in advance. Close of nominations was in early November so there is no reason this information could not have been posted on My SNP letting members and branches know in advance and have some discussion about whom they should be supporting. That would be way too democratic for the current leadership, they were badly burnt the last time elections were held. You are supposed not to notice this intentional shrinking of the time period. Clever manipulation is it not? You will get the required info a handful of days before Conference, too short for any organised campaign to be operated successfully, leaving the organised Woke faction with a big advantage. This is the current leadership treating internal democracy with total contempt, playing the system to disadvantage the ordinary membership, while helping to promote and defend the Woke wing. It is blatant when its pointed out but it seems nobody else but me was willing to do it. It now operates on Stalinist lines where folk go along with it out of fear. Freedom fighters, I don’t think so!

Now here is some fresh information that I personally find quite stunning. I have highlighted before the incredible number of places on the NEC that are non elected by the Party membership. These are places that have been crucial in several key votes yet what is the justification for them being on the NEC in the first place? For back ground when I served on the NEC there were only two appointed positions, everyone else was elected directly by the ordinary members at Party Conference. The non elected places were handed to the Young Nationalists and also the Student body. This is how I first met Nicola Sturgeon she was one of the appointees.

To put this into context the latest published  total of SNP membership is 119,000. There are currently 16 elected Area Representatives meaning each rep is there for approx 7500 members. Note that the Governance Report recommends halving that number of Regional Reps to one per region effectively meaning that one position in each area would be representing 15,000 members each.


So how does that compare with the other groups that have unelected seats on the NEC?

Let’s start with BAME. They have two seats on the NEC and have had them for the last few years. One of these positions is a Vice Convener making whoever holds that post a Senior Office Bearer. A non elected one.

In figures leaked to me they currently have less than 250 members. Yes for less than 250 members you get two places, One a Vice Convener and another one for good measure. 

And it’s not just Bame, let’s look at Out4Indy who are also in receipt of a Vice Convener and another seat on the NEC as well. How many members do they have to justify those two places?

Out4Indy have under 400 members

Let’s keep going, the Disabled Group have one NEC place. They currently have just under 500 members.

Likewise Scots Asians for Independence have a place on the NEC. They currently have just over 100 members. That figure may be substantially reduced given the recent Indian Council in Scotland decision withdrawing support from the SNP because of the actions of Mr and Mrs Yousaf.

I think many members will find the number of seats and Vice Convener positions available against those numbers quite astonishing. They should, this is blatant political engineering handing exceptional favourite status and influence to a very small number of people. All at the expense of the ordinary membership. It’s a fix and now that I have made the official numbers public it has been brought into full view. There can be no doubt of this.

The reality is it could well be even worse, there is a significant number of members who are members of several of these groups and are therefore double, or even treble counted. How do I know that? Well Fiona Robertson, having being kicked off the NEC in the last elections turned up as a “substitute” delegate to the NEC for several of these different organisations in the course of the year before being reappointed without an election to her previous post after her elected successor left to join Alba.

Now of course it can be argued these groups represent important issues, but others are as well. For instance the Trade Union movement involves just under 30,000 members but they have no automatic place on the NEC.

My suggestion is all these groups should form a sub committee of the NEC and the chairperson of that sub committee should have a seat on the NEC. THAT WOULD BE FAIR AND BALANCED. Excluding the Trade Union figures that would give one place on the NEC for at most, ignoring duplicate membership and counting them all, of 1250 members covering all these groups. One seat would still be much more generous than afforded to ordinary members in any region in the country. AT THE MOMENT THESE TINY AFFILIATE GROUPS HAVE SIX SEATS INCLUDING TWO VICE CONVENERS (senior office bearers). Of course there are many others appointed in addition to these groups as well.The need for ordinary members votes and support are increasingly a thing of the past when it comes to the NEC! I think we all know why that is.

Now the leadership have been anticipating this information eventually becoming public as they knew from previous posts that I was working on getting those secret membership numbers, so readers may remember they recently sent out a message to encourage members to join these groups. I am sure I will get an update on the “success” of that recruitment campaign in due course but it has an incredibly long way to go to provide evidence that these Vice Convener and NEC positions are in any way justified.

There is no doubt that the actions of the representatives of some of those elevated to the NEC VIA THE APPOINTED FROM GROUPS  route has been hugely divisive and disruptive as they dominated NEC discussion with a very different agenda to those who were there to forward and deliver Independence. I know of several well respected and long serving party members, serving on the current NEC who will not be re standing for election partly because of this and witnessing meetings turning into pointless events that do nothing to advance the Independence cause.

Another issue that needs attention is the increasing role of paid staff in the Party Organisation. They form a key voting block at any Conference and while not yet being able to outvote the ordinary membership can when organised be very effective in forcing through leadership, as opposed to members wishes. This is a particular danger at online conferences. Limits to this need discussed and a quota system introduced. Given the number of Mp’s and Msp’s there are potentially many hundreds of people involved.


So I promised a name, the key architect of these “reforms” that removed members influence and power, helping to create an unchallengeable leadership, empowering a staff takeover in the form of Peter Murrell to take responsibility and control for issues that were previously, normally the remit of elected Senior Office Bearers of the Party. To cut out any ability to question the leadership on any issue and enable the leadership to introduce new policy measures like the HCB and GRA without any input or challenge from the ordinary membership whatsoever.

Now of course it wasn’t one person alone who did all this because common sense ensures the Party Leader must be involved and in support as must her husband, the Party CEO, but the person most responsible and in my view the key architect of these moves is ANGUS ROBERTSON. It was no coincidence it was him who introduced these “simple” alterations to the constitution at a sparsely attended lunchtime session at Conference a couple of years ago. Ever since the entire Party and Yes Movement have paid a heavy price for delegates not realising the significance of what was happening and going for a cup of tea at the vital time. He is a master puppeteer and manages to stay in the shadows while pulling all the key strings. He of course accompanies these moves with another quiet programme to establish himself as a shoe in when Nicola stands down. He then hopes to enjoy the Stalin like total control of the Party he helped create for Nicola.

Let’s all hope the WORKERS Revolution takes place before that disaster befalls Scotland and the Independence Movement.

This is a democratic outrage, tiny numbers of Woke people have been handed power over the ordinary membership through the introduction of corrupt reforms precisely designed to create this outcome. Those responsible should be deeply ashamed but so should all the elected members enjoying high salaries but ignoring these conniving measures being introduced to sideline the ordinary membership and establish dictatorial power for the Leader to ruthlessly control the Party to her whims. Past members who worked and died to further the Independence cause and built this once great Party have been betrayed. I can never forgive those responsible for that. The SNP have their conference later this week, is there any chance some are brave enough to raise the content of this article or are they all enjoying life being re educated and bribed in the political gulag?


I am, as always



Unfortunately a number of pro Indy sites have turned out to be merely pro SNP sites and have blocked a number of bloggers, including myself. We have managed to frustrate these efforts to close us down through our readers sharing our articles and building our audience.Sharing is very important and helps the Independence message to reach a much wider audience. In addition many have taken out free direct subscriptions. I very much appreciate this support.

Free Subscriptions

Are available on the Home and Blog pages of this website. By taking out a subscription you will receive notification of all future posts. You will be most welcome.

16 thoughts on “HOW TO TAKE OVER A PARTY.

  1. She also wanted to change the name of the Scottish National Party. I thought at the time, why would you want to change the name of the SNP? The question I had running around my head was, how far is this woman going to make the SNP all about her and her alone. If you take everything into account that the SNP has done there isn’t a coherent direction, it’s all chaos. Only now you can understand what she’s been doing, its designed to destroy the SNP, the Yes movement and everything that Alex Salmond’s touched.

    Why punish Scotland because of the former FM. I know one thing, he wouldn’t want Scotland to suffer because of him. She isn’t punishing Alex Salmond she punishing us for questioning her lack of action on Indyref2 and her ability as a FM to stand up for Scotland against the UKG. What has she shown us in the 8yrs while she been FM, complete contempt and hatred for anyone who questions her on anything or her ability as FM.

    She’ll even call herself British just to put us in our place and no one will even try to defy her. This is what the New SNP has become, so yes the New SNP should change its name to, the British national Party, it’ll suit her and her supporter well.

    Liked by 9 people

  2. I’ve just read about different of types of dictatorships, like single-party dictatorships; controlled by the members of a political party and even personalist dictatorships – controlled by a single individual… True, and WE know of one that MANY now call the ‘NuSNP’.

    Liked by 6 people

  3. This does not mellow with age, and it does not improve with a second reading.
    I asked the question a few months ago – “Is it too late to save the SNP?”
    As time has passed and the situation within the SNP gets steadily worse and with no sign that the many thousands of members left within the party who joined to enable independence are mobilising to refocus the attention back on what was once the prime objective, I believe that the question has now been answered in the negative.
    Whatever, I and so many others think of the FM and her leadership of the SNP, she is not stupid and knows full well what her actions and inactions are doing to the future prospects of self-determination for Scotland.
    So, that begs another question – why?? I have wondered for some time now whether the British state holds something devastatingly injurious to her private and public life? Apart from consolidating her position within the SNP and as FM, is there something else entirely different of which we are all unaware that could possibly explain what the hell is going on?

    Liked by 9 people

    1. Very good question. It surely all can’t come down to a malign character and her cynical devious assistants?
      Cynical and devious people can still run the SNP as a pro independence party, purssuing its central aim whilst acting with the very same nastiness to whoever might threaten their positions? There is obviously something more going on here.

      Liked by 7 people

    2. Could it be anything to do with the NATO/TRIDENT lobby? Stray(?) references to multi-lateralism. amicable relationships with Joe Biden/the wanderings of Alyn Smith/Stewart McDonald,her close allies…….

      Liked by 2 people

  4. Like the old Labour party, they have learned nothing, and continue rolling ever downward and think that we are all mug enough not to notice. Disheartening is putting it mildly, absolutely scunnered with the lot of the might be a better way to put it. Sigh!

    Liked by 8 people

  5. For comparison, Al Jazeera’s investigation into the “takeover” of the Labour Party and the expulsion of Corbyn and his supporters is probably worth your time.

    The background and motivations of the participants are neither here nor there, only that a determined, organised group can effect this without too much effort. There are many other examples in western democracies where this happened/is happening.

    Liked by 7 people

  6. I agree with the description of how the Sturgeon Cabal have manipulated the rules to keep control of the tiller.
    However none of her Machiavellian scheming would work without the silent majority sitting in those rows of seats at conference or maintaining their membership of the Party. It would not work without the inaction of MPs and MSPs putting their comfortable lifestyle before the Rights of the People of Scotland.
    It would not work if the voters in Scotland repeated what they did to Labour when they put Party ahead of People.

    McCann, Murrell, Robertson, Russell and dozens more using a private army to control a Party. Until the members speak up or walk away it will get worse every day.

    The majority of members gaze at the “Indy Carrot”, which is non existent.
    The Cult get their GRA for voting as ordered.
    The old buddies of the SNP elite keep power.

    Those who have left can only look on bemused at how far and how fast Sturgeon reduced what was once Party of Scotland.

    Liked by 7 people

  7. It’s clearly time to have a petition to remove Sturgeon from the leadership and her cabal . We the electorate have no faith or confidence in Sturgeon leadership ,she is destoying the independence movement from the inside out a Trojan horse. 8 years of nothing but sould bite ,acquiescence and capitulation to Westminster. Sturgeon isn’t going to lead us anywhere but down the plug hole with her tethered together pals. It’s time for change at the top of the SNP. Everyone should write to their MP and MSP and tell them we are pissed off. If they dont get the message we need to lay siege to Hollyrood to drive the message through. We the people are sovereign we want out of this shit coercive colonial dictatorship if the SNP won’t do it we will vote for another party that will.

    Liked by 4 people

  8. Brave commentary from my fellow Albanista, Gordon, which will no doubt clarify some of the defections from the SNP that other loyalists are still troubled by!
    Angus Robertson has given himself away. Like many others I was horrified when he lost his seat parliamentary after what was apparently a brilliant run of election management. I signed up to Progress and paid up and was mystified by the lack of information. Then the jiggerypokery with Joanna Cherry’s
    attempt to return to Holyrood and all became clear. The Progress contributions stopped immediately- by quite a few I suspect.
    The last straw was his publication of his book about Vienna last year. i thought to myself that this is a man who is not that concerned about the Scottish drive for independence and doesn’t care who knows it!

    Liked by 3 people

    1. I stopped my contribution to Progress Scotland and I am still struggling to discover what happened to all those contributions. It is a limited company which only publishes micro accounts at Companies House.

      Liked by 2 people

  9. Sorry if I confused folks!I thought I was replying to Gordon’s article ‘Want to be an Equalities Officer in the SNP’?-Hence my reference to Gordon.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: