THE FREEPORT RUSE EXPOSED!

by Professor Alf Baird, a briefing paper prepared on behalf of Salvo/Liberation.

EVALUATION OF GREEN FREEPORTS IN SCOTLAND

Professor Alf Baird

Freeports are a Tory Policy

Scots should remember that Freeports are a Tory Party initiative in the UK. The policy is being imposed on Scotland without public support here. Organisations facilitating the Freeport policy in Scotland, including the SNP Scottish Government and Local Authorities, are therefore supporting and enabling a Tory policy. Yet this is not something the Scottish people voted for, need or want.

The Freeport Concept in the UK

Globally, Freeports tend to be limited to container freight transhipment operations. This is where freight is brought into a port area, stored there, then processed, packaged etc before being re-exported. Freight going through the Freeport is therefore not normally intended for the domestic market, it is for export to third countries.

The Freeport concept now applying to the UK does not follow this established international model or practice. UK ports do not function as ‘transhipment’ facilities in Europe, they primarily serve only the UK import/export market.

This means the UK Freeport model is simply extending tax and Customs advantages to businesses that are or will be active mainly in serving the domestic UK market.

Port governance in the UK

Major seaports in the UK are mostly either privately owned or run as ‘trust’ ports. Port privatization was another Tory policy imposed on Scotland during the 1990s without the support or even the consent of Scots; Scotland then was a Tory Free Zone. Trust ports are an earlier English model of ‘corporatization’ of public assets likewise imposed by Westminster on Scots without their support or consent.

The ‘indigenous’ model of port governance in Scotland was that ports were owned by their communities and run by the Burgh’s, with surpluses going into Common Good Funds and investment in new port infrastructure. This meant there was local control over port infrastructure, trade and the economy which prevented profiteering.

The common approach internationally today also remains public ownership and governance of major seaports, known as ‘the Latin model’ of port governance. Only the UK under Tory rule has sought to privatise ports by selling them off or ‘corporatizing’ them into so-called ‘trust’ ports. The main criticism of both these corporate port ‘models’ is the lack of local representation and the focus on profit and interception of economic rents by private interests through exploitation of local and regional port monopolies.

Green Freeports

The Tory Freeport policy has been very slightly adapted in Scotland through the addition of the word ‘Green’ by the Scottish Government, in an effort to make the ideology more palatable to Scots. This reflects the fact the ports selected – Forth (incl Tay) and Cromarty – are also to serve the local maritime supply chain needs of massive new offshore wind energy installations currently being developed.

This further demonstrates that the UK Freeport initiative is not about normal transhipment trade development or serving the logistics needs of third countries, it is about something quite different. The beneficiaries of Green Freeport status are expected to be primarily commercial entities that are already participating in, or will be involved in the installation, maintenance and power generation of offshore wind energy.

The rather obvious question here is, because the offshore wind energy schemes in Scotland were already going ahead, why is Freeport status deemed necessary? These offshore energy schemes were never dependent on Freeport status in ports, they were always going to proceed. Another factor to consider is that Freeports have not needed to be created at ports elsewhere in Europe which are heavily involved in developing nearby offshore wind energy facilities (e.g. Esbjerg, Eemshaven, Rostock, Gdansk etc).

Governance

Local Authorities have a very limited role in Freeports located in their areas. The Freeports will be run by a stand-alone corporate enterprise, a company limited by guarantee. LA’s may have just one member on a 12-person Freeport company board, which implies very limited influence. Around £1 million UK government support is expected to be provided to help establish Freeport companies. The Freeport company may also access £25 million seed capital Government funding to help develop sites. Given the normally high cost of new port infrastructures the amount of government investment appears relatively insignificant.

LA’s will not receive non-domestic rate income from Freeport sites which benefit from 100% non-domestic rate relief for eligible businesses for 5 years. LA’s are to retain 100% of uplift in non-domestic rates revenues for 25 years – which supposedly offers a ‘potential’ income stream enabling LA’s to borrow to invest in infrastructure, skills and other associated programmes, albeit subject to risk. However, NDR growth only comes from the build out and delivery of Green Freeport sites. The funding available that can be reinvested is therefore dependent on the ability of Freeports to be developed and the pace of delivery, all of which remains uncertain. 

Questionable local benefits

Offshore energy equipment supply chains are mostly located outside Scotland and to a large extent also outside the UK. The equipment and materials used in setting up offshore wind energy installations is therefore mostly imported. The heavy-lift marine contractors installing the equipment and materials are largely international and brought in from outside Scotland. Ongoing maintenance contracts, which involve relatively few jobs, may or may not involve local enterprises. As noted, offshore energy installations are already going ahead and are not dependent on Freeport status. Overall employment impacts of ‘Green Freeports’ therefore appear very limited.

The immense expected value of the energy produced and exported in future decades, which would happen anyway without Freeports, will largely be a matter for the companies contracted to provide it. Communities have no real input in that, neither do LA’s, whist income for the Scottish Government from leases was very limited and much less than would be expected elsewhere.

Despite having secured Freeport status for their areas, the LA’s concerned do not yet fully understand what this actually means, how it will be delivered, or what the benefits may be. Any major benefits for communities therefore remain obscure, but appear limited overall, and it remains uncertain what Green Freeports will deliver in the short, medium and longer term. 

Tax Havens?

We have heard of offshore tax havens, which are countries offering low or no corporate taxes. Freeports in the UK, are clearly not about freight transhipment, which is the main purpose of Freeports internationally. Freeports in the UK are therefore something else, and will essentially offer an opportunity for multinational firms to avoid paying taxes. 

Green Freeports in Scotland are not about generating trade in goods. As offshore energy installation supply chains remain largely dependent on imported goods (now avoiding Customs duty in a ‘Freeport’), this means they are unlikely to generate much in the way of economic growth for local communities, or nationally in Scotland. 

The main ‘product’ generated from offshore wind facilities will be renewable energy of immense value over many decades. However, the value of this resource will also bypass communities in Scotland, including now the profits made by the energy businesses involved as they will not pay tax within a Freeport.

Consequently, it is difficult to see Green Freeports as anything other than a new form of Tory Tax Haven being imposed on Scotland with the aim being for multinational companies to more fully exploit Scotland’s resources and people. This follows on from the earlier Tory privatization and corporatization of Scotland’s major seaports (and most other public utilities), removing these strategic national and public assets from community ownership, without the consent or support of the people. 

The UK Freeports policy demonstrates that the Scottish people are merely rendered bystanders in the ongoing plunder of their nation’s resources and wealth, which is aided and facilitated by national and local government in Scotland.

MY COMMENTS

The content of this paper are hugely important. These Freeport’s will not enrich Scotland they will perpetuate control of large, important areas of Scotland to non Scottish control with any wealth and profit being swiftly removed with little or no benefit for the local communities. They also provide legal loopholes where a wide variety of legislation can be ignored. This includes laws which protect workers rights, which prevent fracking for instance. They are designed to further asset strip our country, made easier by rules that protect the asset stripper. It speeds up the process of robbing Scotland in front of eyes which raises the question WHAT THE HELL IS THE SNP GOVERNMENT DOING SUPPORTING THIS? Are they mad?
So much for the holiday, it lasted a day but this was too important to ignore.

I am, as always

YOURS FOR SCOTLAND

BEAT THE CENSORS

Sadly some websites seek to censor what their readers have access to read. This is particularly true of sites whose existence is primarily to support the views of one particular party and they seek to block articles which do not slavishly support that particular doctrine. My readers have worked out that the best way to defeat that attack on the freedom of speech and thought is to share my articles widely, thus defeating any attempt at censorship. My thanks for this.

SALVO AND LIBERATION

Are playing a crucial role in taking Independence forward. This site limits donations to Yours for Scotland to a maximum of £3. We do not need more as all we seek to do is to cover the costs incurred in running the blog therefore once this is secured each year all further donations are forwarded to Salvo and Liberation. My thanks for all who choose to support us in this way. It is appreciated.

SALVO MERCHANDISE

https://www.ebay.co.uk/str/salvoscot

33 thoughts on “THE FREEPORT RUSE EXPOSED!

  1. It’s clear this is more colonial theft of resources without any benifit to the Scottish indigenous population or our economy. The profits being milked into the City of London hedge funds or to foreign investors.
    We need to punish the colonial SNP administration at the ballot box , they are operating in the colonial masters interests selling us out on all fronts at ever opportunity.
    We need an alternative now to this joke of a pretend independence party. We need a Scotland United approach with an independence candidate in every constituency going forward. The vichy quisling SNP devolutionisyt will do everything to prevent our independence.

    Liked by 15 people

    1. In my view it is naive to think the dark state has not infiltrated the SNP – they are now acting as a puppet that is hostile to Scotlands cause.

      Liked by 12 people

    2. “We need to punish the colonial SNP administration at the ballot box”
      What about an AUOB spokesperson standing as an Independent for Rutherglen that will not take his/her seat in Westminster?

      Liked by 8 people

  2. This is an excellent exposition of a “swizzle” being carried out by calling it something else. We note that many places in Scotland, for example central Aberdeen, would greatly benefit from not having to pay business rates.
    These things are happening because the Scottish government has seized the power to control, sell, and give away Scottish assets without any permissions from the people. A bit like ignorant natives selling their land, mineral rights in return for plastic beads. No, change that. It is exactly like the chiefs of ignorant natives selling to foreigners the land and minerals for a few trinkets. The chiefs become rich, the people lose everything.

    Liked by 14 people

  3. Since the last time Scotland elected a majority of Tory MPs back in 1955, we have had 10 Tory UK election wins with 11 different PMs – not forgetting the red rosette Tories of Blair and Brown.

    Freeports are just the latest in a long list of plunder and exploitation of Scotland’s resources to benefit Mother England with very little, if any benefit to the owners – the People of Scotland.

    Westminster is desperate for cash due to the complete mismanagement of financial affairs by the Tories over the last 13 years. Perhaps “mismanagement” is not the right term, because they have managed the economy very well for the corporate elites and off-shorers.

    As Alf has stated, Freeports are of no benefit to local people or to Scotland, as they are yet another method of enriching the few at the expense of the many that are struggling to heat their homes, feed their families or pay their rent or mortgages.

    Some still believe that the Scottish Government would protect us from such foreign action, but no – here is some of the text of a letter sent by Kate Forbes when she was Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Economy on 12 February 2022. “I very much welcome the resumption of joint working between the Scottish and UK Governments, on a partnership basis, to tailor the UK’s freeports programme to the Scottish policy context.” However, Kate Forbes does go on to say “The Scottish and UK Governments will have equal roles in selecting the winning bids…..”

    Has the SNP learned nothing from over 300 years of domination and rape of our resources – including our people?

    This perfectly illustrates Alf’s point about the major party for independence in a country coming to an accommodation with the coloniser.

    Liked by 12 people

  4. I think the problem is that folk who vote SNP think that they will deliver independence for Scotland, while the reality is that is the last thing the present SNP government want- they just luvv what they have now – trappings with absolutely no responsibility

    Liked by 13 people

    1. O/T but this SG is also saying nothing about the Bibby Stockholm barge that is uncomfortably close to an internment camp – and a dangerous one at that. Trappings with no responsibility is right on the money but their failures go further: prepared to mouth off about the internal affairs of Spain and whatever else tickles their woke fancy but silent as the grave over the UK acting as a monster while they suck from the UK teat. Complicit? Bought and paid for? Utterly useless? Hard to know which …

      Liked by 9 people

      1. “the Bibby Stockholm barge that is uncomfortably close to an internment camp ”
        British Govts have previous on using ships as internment camps, as late as the 20th century. No surprise they are carrying on with the same policy in the 21st

        1923-24: Around 700 Irish Republicans were interned aboard the ship Argenta in Belfast .
        1940-41: The Al Rawdah ship was used to house 140 – 200 republican internees, rounded up on the orders of Stormont’s first Home Affairs Minister, Sir Dawson Bates
        1970-72 :The Maidstone warship was transformed into a prison ship for 120+ internees in Belfast harbour

        Liked by 7 people

      2. “between colonization and civilization there is an infinite distance; out of all the colonial expeditions that have been undertaken….., there could not come a single human value” (Cesaire)

        Liked by 7 people

      1. Aye Iain, possibly why independence was strung out and why there’s loads of politicians not supportive of the sovereignty of the people. There’s that Gupta carry on as well. Everywhere you look our country is being sold off.

        Liked by 12 people

      1. I don’t think that alone will do it, we need people who wouldn’t dare do this kind of thing especially without consent fae the people.

        Liked by 3 people

  5. In terms of offshore energy generation infrastructure this needs to be serviced by vessels regressing and accessing Scottish ports as is already extant in the soon to be expanded oil and gas sector.

    The creation of tax haven private freeports in Scotland is thus another ploy to denude Scotland of income from not just oil and gas, but now too the booming offshore electricity generation.

    Peasants in their own land, Jock owns nothing, gains nothing, and the similarities with glass beads and north American Indians in what was then described as the colonies is there to see.

    A timely article Mr Baird and one that folks hopefully should take notice of.

    Liked by 13 people

  6. UK government policy is a misnomer, what we’re looking at, in this instance and others, is the UK government’s delivery and enablement of the policies of international-finance. No matter which one of the post-imperial parties we vote for in any forthcoming UK general-election, nothing is likely to change regarding the well embedded stranglehold of external financial-interests on the formulation of all major UK domestic and international policy; and we in the energy-rich, Northern colony are but an impotent adjunct to the case. The inherent good sense in our secession from this increasingly dangerous configuration has never been clearer to see.

    Liked by 10 people

  7. Fae See,
    I think we should call it what it is, blatent theft of Scottish assets, aided by the SNP. Maybe Yousef is looking for a Knighthood……

    Liked by 8 people

    1. They would do well to start looking for forgiveness and making things right. What’s a Knighthood other than ego with benefits?

      Liked by 3 people

      1. I guess there’s people who are willing to do things even if they go against what they said they say they believe in for the purpose that they only really know inside.
        SNP were in favour of the monarchy as you know so am sure there’s a fair few who have bent the knee.

        Liked by 7 people

  8. Thank you Alf and Salvo for collating all these points so effectively! I was against Green (sic) Freeports from the start as it sounded like a neoliberal tax avoidance, scheme. Indeed we have Kate Forbes to thank for them as she really pushed for them!

    “WHAT THE HELL IS THE SNP GOVERNMENT DOING SUPPORTING THIS? Are they mad?”

    Mad? Bought and Sold? Compromised? All of the them?

    Who knows Iain but ultimately it’s irrelevant. I only hope that the SNP and Forbes involvement in them doesn’t go against us in the argument of colonialism. Yes Alf I know mediocre meritocracy and captured colonial administration but it doesn’t help!

    Liked by 9 people

    1. These policies were never in snp manifestos that I can recall. I’ll stand corrected if so therefore they do not have our consent despite snp involvement.

      Liked by 4 people

  9. these freeport’s are a very bad idea and strike at the very concept of equity and fairness wherever you are in Scotland. Level playing fields they are not. Closed minds in government and their advisors fail to grasp the reality that the SG doesn’t have to cooperate with the U.K. government’s initiatives just to get the handout.

    Tax manipulation by government and the private sector is one of the greatest scourges we face. Remove tax manipulation by replacing it all with a simple land tax system which can’t be avoided provides the level playing field, the opportunity to develop while providing real security to all..

    Liked by 10 people

  10. Here are the questions as if I were directing one question to each of them:

    **To Angus Robertson:**

    * Why is Freeport status deemed necessary for the offshore wind energy schemes in Scotland, when these schemes were already going ahead?

    **To Stewart McDonald:**

    * What are the real benefits of Green Freeports for local communities?

    **To Caroline Lucas:**

    * How will the tax breaks and other advantages offered to multinational companies under the Green Freeports policy impact on the Scottish economy?

    **To Clive Lewis:**

    * How will the Green Freeports policy affect environmental protection standards in Scotland?

    **To Richard Burgon:**

    * How will the Green Freeports policy be monitored and evaluated to ensure that it is delivering the promised benefits?

    **To the Scottish Government, the UK Government, and the local authorities that are involved in the Green Freeports policy:**

    * Please answer the questions above.
    * Please explain how the Green Freeports policy is in the best interests of Scotland.

    I don’t know why and I don’t know how. But I need to pass you this information. It’s important to our future. And you can help change it. Be Kind and Inspire change.

    Liked by 6 people

  11. I’m very suspicious that the Forth “Greenport” just happens to include Grangemouth, owned by Brexiteer and the 2nd richest man in UK Jim Ratcliff. He hugely wants to begin fracking in Scotland and this could be all the green light he needs to begin operations.

    Liked by 10 people

    1. Then we should take a lesson from Just Stop Oil – and just stop him!!!

      It is shockingly clear that law and democracy are failing in Scotland. Reasoned debate and due process serve no-one but the deplorable s who have lied their way into power.

      Liked by 2 people

  12. two quotes to remember,
    “1”
    The most effective way to destroy people, is to destroy and obliterate their own understanding of
    their history. ”
    George Orwell.
    “2”
    I hate imprialism. I detest the consequences of their last bitter struggle for life.
    We, are determined, that our nation, and the world as a whole, will not be the plaything of one small corner of the world.
    ” Soekarno”

    Liked by 2 people

Comments are closed.