Letter from Denmark: Three Quarters of an Auld Alliance

Another article from the excellent writer Peter Young of IndyScot News.


The drawback with the outdoor ice-rink at the entrance to Frederiksberg Have (park) is the ice-hockey skates for hire. They have no brakes. But the scene is beautiful in the fading light. 

A few days ago there was a massive march here. Drone footage on Twitter X followed its entire length. It went from the local town hall about 500 metres away, and stretched to the city centre. Buses arrived from Jutland and Fyn and up to 70 organisations supported the march. Once it got to the outdoor ice-rink, it turned left down Frederiksberg Alle – a broad Paris-style boulevard.

https://x.com/PopularMedia8/status/1744809107071107403?s=20

The event was similar to the great indy marches of previous years. And just as our erstwhile nationalist First Minister never attended a single pro-independence march, Danish PM Frederiksen has, so far, attended none of these peace marches. She’s no Olof Palme, that’s for sure.

That said, Mette Frederiksen is now under pressure to distance herself from the horrors being perpetrated by the Israeli regime. But if she’s to land an international top post, how far dare she go? There are certain jobs prime ministers eye-up while in office. Politicians have to be ‘sound’, though. ‘Sound’ in the Sir Humphrey Appleby sense, if they’re to be considered. The careerist’s dilemma is tangible in the disconnect between Frederiksen and the ‘Dane in the street’.

In a nation with a surfeit of political parties in parliament (16 at the last count) one of them decided to abolish itself this week. Nye Borgerlige – New Right – are no more. Led by the effervescent Pernille Vermund, they looked at their 1.6% in the polls, just below the [2%] threshold for representation, and decided to fold. Vermund has decided to seek pastures new, within the political bubble. Rumours suggest she and her MPs will join one of the other parties. And why not? The views of one populist party of the right are pretty much like the others. Much of a muchness. That said, Vermund may have an eye on the EU elections in June. She’d feel quite at home listening to Ursula von der Leyen, I’m sure. And the EU is, after all, the ultimate gravy train.

We Scots don’t have a surfeit of parties, but it can only be a matter of time before the wider Scottish public realises, that voting for any Unionist party standing in our land, returns the same result – English colonial rule. Tory, Lib-Dem, and Labour are merely Unionist parties now. Most of them have as much in common with the Orange Order and Ulster Unionism as they do with each other. This week highlighted the scourge of a ‘British Scotland’ as part of the United Kingdom – we did not join other nations in supporting South Africa’s case against Israel at the ICJ. Would an independent Scotland have been so insensitive to the sufferings of an occupied, colonised people? I like to think not.

Of course, the big news here is Queen Margrethe’s decision to abdicate – announced during her traditional New Year’s Eve speech. “We were at the last-ever torchlight procession to welcome Margrethe to Fredensborg Palace last spring,” my son pointed out. He’s home from republican France at the moment. A sense of history clearly came over him, here in the land of his birth. He probably feels some kind of connection to the royal institution, as much of his childhood was spent playing in the grounds of the royal residence not far from here. Fredensborg Palace was popular with Margrethe and her late French husband, Henri. We had a favourite place in the sprawling grounds next to a monument surrounded with a ring of canons. On display every summer, these things catch a child’s imagination. Those were simpler days, when our children’s biggest task was collecting sticks and twigs. Oor bairns grow up too fast, don’t they?

There is huge affection for Margrethe throughout all layers of Danish society. Less so, for PM Frederiksen and political careerists around her. Coming 24 hours after the Queen’s, Frederiksen’s speech was rather dull. Commentators pointed out how she bathed in the reflected warmth for the Queen. To me, there was a sense of listening to someone luxuriating in the trappings of politics and power – especially if you happen to be top dog at Christiansborg during a historic constitutional event. I was reminded of Sturgeon’s abject grovelling when meeting King Charles. Her obsequious bowing and scraping to English royalty merited Olympic qualification, if a ‘Grovelling Housejock’ discipline existed.

As we know all too well, demonstrations bring provocateurs out of the woodwork. The huge march in the Siberian cold of 7th January was no different. One of these bad actors, an unashamed Zionist – Jaleh Tavakoli – was involved in a stunt. Three camera phones recorded a rather tame, ostensibly staged confrontation. But she managed, through 24/7 online agitation, to get a mention in the news. She did what ‘Manky Jaiket Man’ does at AUOB marches. She demonises Muslims, whereas Manky Jaiket attempts to discredit nationalists. Turns out, Jaleh was sentenced to three months in prison a couple of years ago. She posted a banned video online of the murder of two girls, a Dane and a Norwegian, in Marokko. Tasteless and insensitive. This was despite the parents appealing for no one to share the video. The usual low-follower bots supported her demonstration stunt on Twitter X, in what is now standard practice in the information war. It’s a template you see on Scottish Twitter X, too.

A provocateur may have managed some self-publicity and mainstream coverage, but it’s a bit different for the tens of thousands of peace protesters when it comes to the Danish state broadcaster. Usually excellent on domestic issues, the pro-Palestine marches touch on Danish foreign policy. Producers may have been on a BBC course on how to downplay huge demonstrations. There certainly seems a strange disconnect between the recent mass protests and media coverage. Which leaves us wondering who is running Danish foreign policy.

With GE2024 ahead, we can only guess as to what dirty tricks will be employed by Scotland’s colonial broadcaster. Will the Alba Party and ISP be blanked? Will Salvo or Liberation get a mention? Is the fallout from Operation Branchform about to be dropped on voters in the election run-up?

As far as voting goes, I’ve no doubt ballot-rigging will be used to destroy the nationalist vote. ‘Oh, take off your tin-foil hat, Pete,’ you may say. Fact is, London is currently engaged in regime change and dirty tricks in many countries. With so much at stake, economically and politically, why would she [England] stop at the Scottish border? We already know about the 77th Brigade, and about the vast comms budget at the Scotland Office. 

But whatever the result, we’ll end up with Westminster’s undemocratic rule of Scotland. Looking forward to our liberation, a clone of Westminster won’t cut it. Europe-wide there is a dearth of political quality. Careerism has replaced statesmanship. The days of electing people for five-year terms who renege on campaign promises as soon as they’re FPTP’ed into power, is for the dustbin of history. 

Just look at the list-vote Holyrood parliament, full of low-grade, under-qualified candidates, lacking life experience, and in some cases, bereft of sanity. Swiss-style Direct Democracy is the future. The people must be directly involved in the decision-making process as advocated by salvo.scot and endorsed by isp.scot

England is currently at war with Russia, Yemen, the Palestinians, and the Syrians. It has helped destroy Libya – once the most prosperous and socially advanced country in Africa. And as we know, politicians in London helped facilitate decades of violence in the north of Ireland, not to mention invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. The people were opposed to these wars. Yet the millions who marched were ignored. That’s not democracy in action – it’s tyranny.

Westminster represents anti-democracy. An independent Scotland with Direct Democracy would allow the voice of the people to be heard on important issues of domestic and foreign policy. Politics is too important to be left to the careerist spivs pocketing huge salaries, while ignoring voters.

The best part of the Queen’s speech on New Year’s Eve was her appeal to our common humanity – to remember that both Israelis and Palestinians are human beings. 

Unfortunately, elected PM Frederiksen has been too cowardly to condemn Israel’s horrific genocide. Ironically, she bragged about the Danish material support of Ukraine with weapons, yet offered no similar support – moral or other – for Palestine. And that’s before we recall that the words ‘negotiation’ and ‘conciliation’ have never once crossed her lips since 2022. Denmark along with the rest of the Nordics is suffering from a severe case of billy big baws, in thrall to a nation thousands of kilometres across the Atlantic – it can’t even investigate the destruction of key European undersea energy infrastructure in its maritime waters.

As you read this Frederik X will become the new Danish monarch in a low-key ceremony. There will be no English-style coronation circus. It’s all very pragmatic. I’ve no idea if the future Queen Mary feels anything for Scotland. Her Scottish parents departed our shores in the 1960s. Her father John, hails from Cockenzie. Born Mary Donaldson, she and her French-Danish Prince are three quarters of an Auld Alliance marriage! I wonder if they’ve thought about that?

MY COMMENTS

My thanks once again to Peter Young for sharing another of his well written pieces. The abdication of the Danish Queen is a key event as she is hugely popular, helped undoubtably by being the head of a very slimmed down monarchy in comparison to the UK. The news that Edinburgh Council laid out a six figure sum for King Charles visit there, which included great ceremony, but the complete absence of him taking the Scottish Oath confirming the sovereignty of the Scottish people, examples a huge waste of money and Scotland still having no legal monarch. To become monarch in Scotland, the Scottish oath, acknowledging the people’s sovereignty must be taken.

I am, as always

YOURS FOR SCOTLAND

BEAT THE CENSORS

Unfortunately there are some sites where extensive blocking takes place against bloggers who do not slavishly follow the dictates of one political party. This is a direct threat to freedom of speech and I unhesitatingly condemn such action. To overcome this problem I rely on my readers to share Yours for Scotland articles as widely as possible. My thanks to those who help overcome censorship.

FREE SUBSCRIPTIONS

The most reliable way to get articles from this site is by taking out a free subscription which are available on the Home and Blog pages of the Yours for Scotland website. Given that I often seem to face other problems with both Twitter and Facebook this guarantees that my content is freely available.

SALVO

Salvo continues to do valuable work and an ever increasing number of people are involved. They are now running strong campaigns on several key issues and as the campaigning arm of Liberation.Scot they are the key to success. If you would like to make a donation to further Salvo and Liberation’s campaigning here are the details. All donations large or small greatly helps our work.

Bank RBS

ACCOUNT SALVOSCOT Ltd.

Ac number 00779437

Sort Code 83-22-26

LIBERATION.SCOT

If you have not already joined please visit the above website and join now. We are looking to achieve a membership larger than any other political organisation in Scotland to approach the UN to achieve the official status as Scotland’s Liberation Movement intent of removing the colonising forces from our nation. Be part of it.

24 thoughts on “Letter from Denmark: Three Quarters of an Auld Alliance

  1. The usual astuteness from Peter Young in his subtle comparisons and contrasts between Denmark/Scandinavia and Scotland/Britannia.

    My pick from this article is the possibility of recognising achievers in a “‘Grovelling Housejock’ discipline”:

    Given Scotland’s representatives in Holyrood’s House of Horrors and its equivalent in Westminster there would be a highly competitive field,

    Liked by 9 people

    1. “My pick from this article is the possibility of recognising achievers in a “‘Grovelling Housejock’ discipline”

      It would be difficult to limit the longlist, far less finalise the shortlist!

      Liked by 9 people

  2. “Will the Alba Party and ISP be blanked?”

    Yes

    Will Salvo or Liberation get a mention?

    No

    “Is the fallout from Operation Branchform about to be dropped on voters in the election run-up?”

    If MI5/Special Branch have any sense, yes

    “Just look at the list-vote Holyrood parliament, full of low-grade, under-qualified candidates, lacking life experience, and in some cases, bereft of sanity”

    Let me channel Alf here, mediocre meritocracy. Like 75% of the voters, I voted Yes for a Scottish parliament, however since 2021, the limitations of that intake are writ large.

    Mhairi McAllan, Maggie Chapman, Lorna Slater and Emma Riddock all elected then. Meanwhile we lost Andy Whitman and Joan McAlpine. I rest my case.

    Liked by 12 people

    1. panda paws it is perhaps only coincidence that you first select Mhairi McAllan in your much abbreviated list of the ‘mediocre meritocracy’.

      Calton Jock did an excellent expose on the McAllan *dynasty*(?) in his blog article of the 30th December past which highlighted how nepotism fulfils itself within the higher echelons of the SNP regardless of ‘limitations’.

      Liked by 7 people

  3. Once again, Peter does not miss his targets and his comparisons and comments are as astute and relevant as ever on Scotland’s colonial status.

    “Swiss-style Direct Democracy is the future. The people must be directly involved in the decision-making process as advocated by salvo.scot and endorsed by isp.scot”. This is hugely popular with those that get to hear about how Direct Democracy can change Scotland from an elected dictatorship to a country where the people have ultimate control. However, just as England cannot afford Scottish independence financially, they could not afford an independent neighbour using Direct Democracy as their form of government.

    Politicians and careerists are terrified about the possibility of Direct Democracy and that’s why the only party currently supporting and promoting it is the ISP. I really like Peter’s statement that so succinctly described my feelings about politicians – “Politics is too important to be left to the careerist spivs pocketing huge salaries, while ignoring voters.”

    However, Direct Democracy cannot be achieved during our ongoing colonisation and that is something for the people of Scotland to decide once our freedom has been achieved. In the meantime, it can still be used to illustrate how differently our lives could be when we have the powers to participate in world affairs as an independent nation.

    Peter’s comment about our MSPs being “low grade” and “under-qualified” could not be more true and that’s one of the main reasons that some of our supposedly independence seeking parties and politicians are now a barrier to our freedom. Once independent, they are out of a job and from what I have seen of most, what skills do they have that would be of interest to another employer?

    Finally, Peter’s comment “Will the Alba Party and ISP be blanked? Will Salvo or Liberation get a mention?” made me smile. Our ‘national broadcaster’ has been our oppressor’s main propaganda tool for decades and we can be assured it will be used against Scotland at each and every opportunity. England has far too much to lose and that brings to mind a statement of Albert Einstein in 1949 – ‘There will come a time when the rich own all the media and it will be impossible for the public to make an informed opinion’ – could not have phrased it better!

    Liked by 12 people

  4. Swiss style Direct Democracy would indeed be an ultimate aspiration, but the Swiss employ this only for “big ticket” decisions. These are referenda on significant law changes and the proposals being voted on must be debated and drafted by Parliament. As we ken weal from bitter experience in Holyrood, insufficiency examined proposals lead to uninformed debate lead to disastrously written law. The devil is in the details.
    This takes us back to:
    * The paucity of opinion in our (Permanent State sanctioned) Parliament.
    * The woeful quality of our careerist, technically illiterate, unworldly, middle-class politicians.
    Correct item one and to a large extent, you address item two.

    The dearth of variety in intellectual discourse in Holyrood is no accident. In fact, this has been engineered by the Permanent State to correct for a (presumably unforeseen) glitch in the D’Hondt algorithm.
    The high point in true, proportional representation at Holyrood was 2003 with eight MSPs outwith the five establishment parties..
    By design and surreptitious manipulation we are now left with slightly different flavours of our Permanent State endorsed, bland menu.
    The fall of the Scottish Socialist Party was the result of various factors, but their political posters at election time were a feature of our streets. The ability of the SSP to harness the enthusiasm of their support and promote their message through poster campaigns will have played a significant part in their returning six MSPs in 2003. By the 2007 election, Margo MacDonald would be the only independent voice at Holyrood. As of the 2016 election, Holyrood was reduced to the five establishment parties
    This display of “populism” was intolerable to the Permanent State. By the 2016 election, 32 out of 36 Scottish councils had established by-laws prohibiting election posters on council owned street furniture.
    The four “hold-out” councils continue to allow election posters on street furniture, proving that any perceived “littering” issue can be managed rather than resorting to prohibition. It’s no coincidence that all four councils are rural and are substantially populated by independent councillors, free from the admonishments of any party head office. As we also ken weal, infiltration and capture of Party, head offices is something the apparatus of the Permanent State is well accustomed to covertly arranging.

    Liked by 10 people

    1. So many great comments above. Vivian, to address two of your points.

      *The Danish electoral system: Imperfect as it is, is vastly superior to FPTP and our ain two-vote d-Hondt. There’s only one vote, and the 2% threshold means there is a broad array of parties and views represented. You can choose to ‘personal vote’ for a candidate you like, but if they’re not that successful vote-wise, the votes aren’t wasted. These votes merely revert to the party’s national vote share. Anyway, a lower threshold in Scottish parliamentary elections could change the landscape.

      *On election posters: These are quite a sight here during local and national elections. They’re just everywhere. There’s almost no littering, though, as all posters have to be removed by a certain date after the election. Failure to do so incurs fines. As a consequence, the parties are as quick to remove their potential littering posters as they are to hang them on lamp-posts, trees, etc.

      Liked by 8 people

  5. Hope you enjoyed the holidays, Pete. Yes, indeed, the military-minnow states are in awe of the US and not a little afraid of its all-encompassing reach and power within every crucial aspect of Western life; which for politicians includes their future careers. It is a dangerous moment for world peace and for what passes as democracy in the West when all the minnow-state politicians need to do is endorse the State Department’s geopolitical preferences and prejudices as a means of safeguarding their privileged positions. Turning a blind-eye to the murderous genocide in Gaza*, is but the latest low in a long list of such capitulations by our minnow-politicians. Some of us are already wondering who the next victims might be in the joint-project to [change the middle-east forever] to paraphrase Netanyahu.

    *Who amongst us actually believes that an ICJ ruling is required on the matter, or that it’ll make a blind-bit-of-difference?

    Liked by 8 people

  6. “As far as voting goes, I’ve no doubt ballot-rigging will be used to destroy the nationalist vote. ‘Oh, take off your tin-foil hat, Pete,’ you may say. Fact is, London is currently engaged in regime change and dirty tricks in many countries. With so much at stake, economically and politically, why would she [England] stop at the Scottish border? We already know about the 77th Brigade, and about the vast comms budget at the Scotland Office.”
    —————
    Regarding the question of ballot rigging 2014 referendum I was recently watching again the linked YouTube in which Democratic Socialist Federation Education Officer Andy Anderson introduces the ‘DUNOON UNIT REPORT: THE POSTAL BALLOT AT THE SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM’ (2015):

    “We are now convinced that the Postal Ballot at the Scottish Referendum was compromised by a UK Government agency, and consequently that the ballot result is not democratically valid.”

    ‘DEFENDING DEMOCRACY: DSF REPORT ON THE REFERENDUM POSTAL BALLOT’ (YouTube, April 2015) —

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Remember watching this at the time and found it very compelling. Everyone mentioned Davidson, but as the speaker points out John McTernan gave a very detailed account (on the Sunday before with Andrew Neil) of how the postal ballots would play out, becoming almost a quarter of the total. There’s no way he could have known this, he appears to have spilled the beans beforehand to prepare the public for a No result. His comments were a smoking gun to me. My opinion of this has changed as to why both McTernan and Davidson had inside knowledge – it wasn’t from sampling, but from info passed on by those who may have rigged the ballot.

      Why Alex and the Yes movement dismissed these reports and rushed to accept defeat is something I’ve never understood. All the indications are that it was rigged via the extraordinary number of postal ballots.

      Liked by 5 people

      1. And of course any ballot-rigging was only one aspect of a comprehensive subversion of the democratic process in Scotland by an unmasked British State at its most cynical. The broadcasting media, particularly BBC TV and radio were, and still patently are, in absolute lockstep with this Deep State. So many levels of news distortion and omission. A country the equivalent of Denmark with no meaningful control of broadcasting, particularly not of news. The mendacities of urbane Gavin Essler and Rory Stewart. The abandoning of purdah protocols. Gordon Brown ad nauseam on a BBC loop. The calculated bias of the electoral franchise. The frighteners on our European residents. The utter collusion of the Press, practically every newspaper having a poisonous anti-Salmond column daily on its front page. Big Business lies. The buried McCrone Report. The No Campaign lies over pensions etc. Cameron’s calling in of favours from a host of international leaders to help beat out the bushfire in his Scottish backyard. London-resident, Scottish-born, pop stars and celebrities calling for their homeland to get back to its room and stop embarrassing them. The ridiculously ominous suggestion that Scottish airfields would be bombed. In farcical contrast, the “love-bombing” – “Don’t leave us – lead us!” – following Pierre Trudeau’s successful anti-Québec template. This was England against the ropes. Let us not forget that glimpse. Because Deep Imperial England itself has not for a moment forgotten it, nor will. It has been covertly saturating and acidly dissolving Scotland ever since. Something intended to be terminal is happening. An endgame. More final than 1745 by far. This time, till the last twitching stops…

        Liked by 5 people

      2. Excellent post Fearghas, we need to do something about it…while we still can. It would help greatly if more Scots were not fast asleep and seeing nothing of what is going on. That includes the “leaders”

        Liked by 3 people

  7. Peter
    English colonial rule. Tory, Lib-Dem, and Labour are merely Unionist parties now.
    You missed out the SNP
    The era of the politician and political parties is, and must come to an end. How many more centuries do we have to suffer their failure and self enrichment.
    I listened to those words spoken by a lady at an Alba conference, Stirling I think, The panel and Mr Salmond were to say the least RAIGIN at the thought of people power.

    Liked by 8 people

    1. I remember that. I was watching online and was disappointed that Alba’s top-down plan was for a parallel SNP. structurally and tactically. Craig Murray and Prof Baird have made convincing arguments against working within the structures of the British state.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. The domestic door that leads to the restoration of our self-determination and independence has been firmly closed and very publicly locked for some considerable time, therefore it is difficult to understand exactly why political parties that like to proclaim their independence-seeking credentials continue to knock on that door, hoping that somehow, sometime, someone is going to relent and open it for them!

        Liked by 3 people

  8. ” Is the fallout from Operation Branchform about to be dropped on voters in the election run-up?”.

    Well not a bad question Peter. It would make absoute sense for the establishment to get going with a prosecution. Timing is all and they have delayed well.

    But who will be the four to be charged. We can maybe guess three.

    No doubt we will find out in due course when the tie is deemed right.

    And in the meantime we can all be comfortable that the Police Scotland and Crown Prosecution are not the biased and partisan agents of the establishment.

    Good article Peter.

    Liked by 6 people

  9. He didn’t half do a good article did Calton Jock on the McAllan’s

    I didn’t realise the extent to which boot filling, troughing, and nepotistic cronyism ran in families.

    But look at Humza, his wife, his cousin and how cronyism works for them.

    Or Sturgeon ad her man. It’s the SNP way, and we thought Labour was bad.

    But read the Calton Jock article on Mhairi McAllan and family.

    Liked by 5 people

  10. For me now in 2024 the most salutary enduring strength of this short 2014 documentary is the interspersed feedback from the two Québécois referendum veterans Normand Lester (author: ‘Le Livre noir du Canada Anglais / ‘The Black Book of English Canada’) and Robin Philpot (author: ‘Le référendum volé’ / ‘The Stolen Referendum’). Pierre Trudeau and the Canadian government lied, scaremongered, and illegally funded their way to a Federal win (of less than 1%). The anglophone media played its part well. A key factor was relentless doomsaying regarding currency and pensions. There were (unfulfilled) promises of more powers for Québec if it voted no. And here the mystery of the Cameron’s “love-bombing” farce is solved. It is evident that London closely studied this successful Canadian script and carefully implemented the Trudeau formula. Watching this again now, my dismal sense is that a “geopolitical” decision has been made that Britain, like Canada, must be saved at all costs. “Democracy” in Scotland, therefore, will only be countenanced insofar as it happens to align with that predetermined outcome. Otherwise, there is no line that England (with American backing) will not cross (stealthily, of course — appearances matter). Truth? Who said anything about Truth? Integrity? You are so naive…

    Liked by 2 people

Comments are closed.