FIRST NEWSLETTER FROM THE FREE SPEECH UNION

This newsletter contains information very relevant to Scotland and the new Hate Crime Legislation. Over the last fortnight big numbers of Scots have joined, including myself. This is very dangerous legislation and Freedom of Speech, the basis for democracy in a free society, is very much worth fighting for.

View this email in your browserDear Iain Lawson,

Welcome to the FSU’s weekly newsletter, our round-up of the free speech news of the week. If you’re reading this and you’re not already a paying member please join today, and help us turn the tide against cancel culture.
 In Today’s NewsletterHumza Yousaf says Police Scotland is ‘reviewing’ guidance on NCHIs following the intervention by Murdo Fraser and the FSUFSU sets up Hate Speech Hotline in ScotlandFSU Edinburgh Speakeasy: Thirty Days of Hate Crime LawsThe EDI tax – latest FSU research briefing gains media tractionChristian social worker sues NHS-backed care firm after “being denied job for anti-LGBTQ+ views”Latest episode of the FSU’s weekly podcast is out nowLionel Shriver in conversation with Toby Young – tickets now availableHow we learned to question medicine – tickets now available!FSU banners at national horseboarding eventDisciplinary action for ONS female employees if they object to trans colleagues using their lavatories!Shout out to Mel and Lewis McLean
 Humza Yousaf says Police Scotland is ‘reviewing’ guidance on NCHIs following the intervention by Murdo Fraser and the FSUConservative Member of the Scottish Parliament Murdo Fraser has written to Scotland’s top police officer to demand “urgent clarity” after the force recorded a social media post he had written criticising the SNP-led government’s Non-Binary Equality Action Plan as a ‘non-crime hate incident’ (NCHI), yet failed to do the same when similar complaints were made against SNP First Minister Humza Yousaf and multi-millionaire author JK Rowling.

This is contrary to their own guidance, which is to record all reports of ‘hate crimes’ as NCHIs, no matter how trivial or vexatious. Mr Fraser has previously sent a letter to Police Scotland, that we helped him draft, threatening legal action if they didn’t revise this guidance, in a case we have pledged to fund. (You can find the crowdfunder here.)However, a law suit may not be necessary. According to Humza Yousaf, being interviewed yesterday afternoon, Police Scotland are now “looking at the changes that were made in England and Wales recently [regarding the recording and retention of NCHIs] and reviewing their own procedures in that respect”.If that means Police Scotland are going to revise their national guidance on NCHIs to bring it into line with the guidance that the police in England and Wales are now following – after a succession of legal and legislative victories by Harry Miller and the FSU – that’s excellent news. NCHIs can have a detrimental effect on a person’s career – for instance, they can show up on an enhanced criminal record check and may prevent someone getting a job as a teacher or a carer.What Mr Yousaf said in the interview was slipped in almost as an afterthought, but it sounds very much like our threat of legal action has pressured Police Scotland into doing the right thing, and respecting the free speech rights of Scottish citizens. That means we can allocate the money we’ve raised so far to pay for the defence of any of our members who are contacted by the police in connection with a speech-related ‘hate crime’.Full details here.
 FSU sets up Hate Speech Hotline in ScotlandAs reported in the Times, almost 1,000 new Scottish members have joined in the past fortnight, most of them women, and in response we’ve set up a Hate Speech Hotline in case any of them get into trouble with the police about something they’ve said. We’ve also put an arrangement in place with Levy & McRea, a top firm of criminal lawyers in Scotland, so if any of our members are arrested or interviewed under caution for something speech-related we can come to their aid.

You can find the Hotline number, as well as detailed instructions about what to do if you’re arrested in Scotland for a speech-related offence in this set of FAQs, here.

The Hotline number is also available in this separate set of FAQs, here, which answers questions about the new criminal offences created by the Hate Crime Act.
 FSU Edinburgh Speakeasy: Thirty Days of Hate Crime LawsIn just the first 24 hours after the activation of Scotland’s Hate Crime and Public Order Act on 1st April, 3,800 ‘hate crimes’ were reported to Police Scotland. This was entirely predictable and no doubt reflected a combination of reporting by those keen to make use of the act’s censorious powers and mischievous attempts at exposing its almost comically authoritarian intent. The problems of the law on paper were much discussed in the years it took for it to reach the statute book, but what will happen next?Since the law came into force, the FSU has been inundated with hundreds of new members in Scotland, a sure indication of the level of concern that exists north of the border. But it’s not just the Scots who are paying close attention – free speech supporters in the rest of the UK and internationally are watching closely, anxious to learn how to resist attempts elsewhere to impose similarly draconian measures.On Wednesday 1st May, the FSU brings together an expert panel to discuss what we have learnt from the first 30 days under the new hate crime regime, and what can be done to mitigate its effects and hasten its demise. Speakers confirmed so far include MSP Murdo Fraser, FSU general secretary Toby Young and lawyer David McKie.There will, of course, be plenty of time for discussion, as well as socialising with fellow free speech supporters.Tickets are £5 for FSU members, £10 for non-members.FSU Members can join the event online by registering here.David McKie is a lawyer at the firm of Levy & McRea, with whom we’ve got a special arrangement, so if any of the other panellists – or members of the audience – are arrested for ‘hate speech’ on the night, he will be able to act for them.
 The EDI tax – latest FSU research briefing gains media tractionThe FSU has published its latest research briefing, titled The EDI Tax: How Equity, Diversity and Inclusion is Hobbling British Businesses, and it’s great to see it written up in the Telegraph.The report is authored by our Director of Data and Impact, Tom Harris, and draws on the results of an FSU survey of a representative sample of 800 British workers, all of whom had undertaken some form of Equity, Diversity, Inclusion and Climate (EDIC) training with either a current or former employer.What the data reveals is that authoritarian EDIC training is now endemic in the British workplace. Contrary to the popular slogan that expenditure on these courses is ‘just good business’, it operates, in effect, as an EDI tax. Ambitious employees and senior managers are leaving companies because of the excessive time they’re expected to spend on these courses and, ironically, they are proving most irksome to those they purport to benefit, i.e., members of the LGBT community and ethnic minorities.You can read our latest report hereChristian social worker sues NHS-backed care firm after “being denied job for anti-LGBTQ+ views”A devoutly Christian social worker denied a job because of his views on homosexuality has warned that if he loses a legal challenge it will provide a “green light” to discriminate against religious employees.

Felix Ngole will this week launch proceedings against Leeds based Touchstone Support, after claiming he was denied his dream job as a mental health support worker when they discovered his strongly held Christian beliefs.

Full details here.
 Latest episode of the FSU’s weekly podcast is out nowTalking points on this week’s episode of our podcast include: how we assisted Rachel Maclean MP to get a non-crime hate incident scrubbed from her record, the activation of Scotland’s Hate Crime Act, and how the FSU is configured to support any members north of the border who are arrested or questioned under caution on suspicion of wrongthink.Download and listen hereLionel Shriver in conversation with Toby Young – tickets now availableJoin us on in person or online on Monday 15th April for a very special FSU Speakeasy to hear author Lionel Shriver in conversation with Toby Young. They will discuss Lionel’s new book, MANIA, in which she turns her piercing gaze on the policing of opinion and intellect, and imagines a world in which discriminating against stupid people in any way is heresy. It has been described as “hilarious, deadpan, scathing and at times frighteningly plausible” and will delight the many fans of her fiction and journalism alike.There will, of course, be an audience Q and A and Lionel will be signing copies of her book on the night.In-person tickets and a special offer on the book can be purchased here and you can register to join online here. FSU members attending online can also buy a signed copy of MANIA at a discounted price of £20, including UK delivery, if pre-ordered here before Sunday 14th April.The author Laura Dodsworth recently interviewed Lionel – it’s free to view on her substack, The Free MindhereHow we learned to question medicine – tickets now available!We were delighted that Professor Alan Sokal agreed to deliver the first lecture in our spring series Science, Scepticism and Free Speech. The video of his lecture ‘What is science and why should we care?’ can be watched in full here.The next lecture in the series takes place in three weeks’ time on Wednesday 24th April. This lecture will be given by Professor Paul Garner, professor emeritus in Evidence Synthesis in Global Health at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, on the theme, ‘How We Learned to Question Medicine’.Professor Garner will argue that scepticism is integral to good science and make the case for using the tools of science to hold those in authority to account. Building on the themes of Professor Sokal’s first lecture, Professor Garner will share noteworthy examples where an insistence on xposure of malpractice.You can attend in person in central London or online on Zoom. FSU banners at national horseboarding eventWe would like to thank Daniel Fowler-Prime of Horseboarding UK for displaying FSU banners at Thame Country Fair last weekend. Look out for them adorning the arena at future events in East Anglia, Burghley, Warwickshire, Wiltshire, Cheshire and Sandringham, where we hope they’ll be seen by thousands of attendees. Disciplinary action for ONS female employees if they object to trans colleagues using their lavatories!Women working for the Office for National Statistics face disciplinary action if they object to male-born colleagues using single-sex lavatories and changing rooms, documents leaked documents reveal.

Full details hereShout out to Mel and Lewis McLeanFinally, we’d like to say a special thanks to Mel and Lewis McLean, who have asked mourners at the funeral of their late father, Dr WMR McLean, to donate to the Free Speech Union. The late doctor, known as Melville to his friends, was the consultant in charge of Queenborough House Hospital for geriatrics in the Cannongate, Edinburgh. Sharing the newsletter As with all our work, this newsletter depends on the support of our members and donors, so if you’re not already a paying member, please sign up today or encourage a friend to join, and help us turn the tide against cancel culture. You can share our newsletters on social media with the buttons below to help us spread the word. If someone has shared this newsletter with you and you’d like to join the FSU, you can find our website here.
 Best wishes,Freddie AttenboroughCommunications Officer
 Follow us on social mediaJoin Our CommunityBecome a Member
Make a Donation
Our mailing address is:
The Free Speech Union
85, Great Portland Street
London, W1W 7LT

Copyright © 2024
Free Speech Union Ltd.
All rights reserved.

Newsletter Preferences
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

38 thoughts on “FIRST NEWSLETTER FROM THE FREE SPEECH UNION

  1. Scotland has not become a hotbed of hate and prejudice despite hopeless, hapless, half-witted, Humza’s half-assed Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act.

    The truth is the HCA of the Scottish Government serves as a distraction from what the SNP were elected to do, namely free our country. As well as to silence those principled enough to oppose the crackpot policies of this virtue signaling and ideologically captured Scottish Government.

    Scotland is not to wee nor too poor to govern itself. It’s people are not too stupid for that task either.

    It’s just the dim-witted First Minister and his cabal that are.

    Liked by 11 people

  2. Thanks Iain. I joined FSU a while back when I saw the tsunami coming. I also intend to ask for a Subject Access Request from polis Scotland once all this dies down a bit. I intended to report Sarwar and Useless for their racist rants but was advised to get a VPN first? Can anyone advise me on this please.

    Liked by 5 people

    1. For a free VPN you could install Opera. It”s a good web browser with a built in free VPN.

      If your prepared to pay a small amount per month NordVPN are good and inexpensive.

      I use NordVPN myself, I have used many others inc Express{dear and American} Atlas etc.

      For yourself, Opera would probably be best, it’s basically the Chrome browser with a free

      VPN, It also has all the Google tracking you and spying on you blocked as well.
      If you do install it make sure you turn the VPN on,

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Hello,

    I am dubious of this new law, however. Scotland is marred by sectarianism and racism. If this law helps to stifle this behaviour, it may not be too bad after all.

    Yours sincerely

    Willie McDonald

    Like

  4. this group is Pro Isreal, tries to shut down support for Palastinians facing genocide. It was established by Tory cheerleaders who write for The Spectator & the Sun/Mail.

    Strange bedfellows fir an Indy supporter.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. You need to do better why not add they eat their children and drive over pensioners crossing the road. On the smear you have made point to that in this newsletter or any other literature produced. Then I would take you seriously. It is no surprise journalists support free speech.

      Liked by 5 people

      1. I support free speech. I don’t support the ideology the founders of this group espouse which is anti Scottish Independence, ergo our continued colonisation. I don’t agree with their support for a rogue state committing genocide whilst denigrating those who support the need to put an end to it.

        Young founded the free school model in England which is taking funds from state education budget impacting those communities who rely on state education.

        I wouldn’t deny them their right to free speech. I just find it strange that when Scotland is seeking independence through a route proving our colonisation people would chose to get into bed with those who would retain our colonisation and continues to attack our democracy.

        Liked by 3 people

      2. No doubt they do. Just never trust tories even if they are saying what sounds like the right things. I’ve first hand experience of their duplicitous actions.

        The HCA needs fixing, England hid theirs within wider legislation and renaged on protections for women.

        Governments need to fix this urgently and from our perspective we need to ensure it called Scottish Government HCA NOT just SNP as it was passed by consensus across the Parliament, even a lone Tory supported it. Whatever opinion we hold on SNP and it’s capture the constant references to them is counter productive and reinforces the Unionist tropes about independence as Englands citizens see the two as one in the same.

        It suits the Scottish media too as they can continue to feed the conflation that undermines independence. Their broadcasters know that England doesn’t draw any distinction so will eat up their propaganda that we can’t manage our own affairs.

        So it’s no surprise that this group will happily push the HCA argument but with a very different intent to ours.

        Like

      3. Do you not think the SNP.had a responsibility to think of all that before they introduced this dogs breakfast, badly flawed ill thought out and leaving women unprotected.Blaming others does not wash Yousaf was Justice Minister when it was created and First Minister when it was introduced. It is damaging both the SNP and the Independence cause but that is perfectly in line with what the Sno have been doing since 2015.

        Liked by 5 people

      4. Of course they did and do. There were advocates within the SNP pushing for those protections but bad actors within made sure it didn’t happen.

        Sadly, Humza Yousaf lacks the clout to change this, in my opinion, his position having been masterminded by others that can control him.

        The point is that this legislation was passed by the Parliament not just SNP. So once again Scotland’s Law is being determined by colonial input that is being hidden by blaming (albeit largely of their own design) the only political party, currently, pushing back against the worst of Westminsters efforts to keep us at heel.

        We need our fellow Scots to understand this will always happen whilst Unionist parties sit in our Parliament. Instead of Scots parties who will stand against this type of unacceptable legislation.

        That’s the attack we need against this Law.

        Liked by 1 person

    2. Les Johnstone.

      You are correct, the FSU is part of the Centre for the Response to Radicalisation and Terrorism, their parent company is The Henry Jackson Society, of which if you recall correctly Jim Murphy was a prominent member as BLiS leader.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. I’ll start with a quote…

    “The moment you say that any idea system is sacred, whether it’s a religious belief system or a secular ideology, the moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision, or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible.”
    ― Salman Rushdie

    However respect and consideration must come into play

    I would not put my feet up on the desk in an Arab Country.

    I would not use my left hand to take food from a common bowl in a Muslim Country.

    I would dress respectively when visiting a Mosque, a Catholic Church or a Hindi Temple.

    Having worked with people of many Cultures I tried to follow a basic Rule……

    What was the intent, What was the impact

    You can offend or be offended but was it intended or through a lack of awareness.

    Unfortunately good manners/respect/Kindness have been high jacked by those who DEMAND speech control. E.g. You will use my Pronouns. Being forced to use “She” when referring to your rapist is abuse.

    In my opinion the old guide is still valid and shouting FIRE in a packed theatre is not part of Free Speech.

    Another basic is that you cannot have Democracy without free speech.

    Gaza has been a recent example of Free Speech that has failed. People are not debating, they do not consider History, they ignore the varied opinions in each society…….they have just picked a side and scream at each other. We are reducing a complex issue to two boxes. Free Speech should mean both sides are Free to Speak. The TransCult tried to stop Women Speaking in the same way.

    If you only want to hear those who agree with you and to silence those who don’t then you do not support Free Speech.

    Free Speech…..Debate…..Being Considerate , are a complex mix. Look at “Be Kind” which has been turned from a positive into a tool to silence people.

    Liked by 7 people

    1. Superb summary of hate Clootie. I too have travelled well and visited many cultures. Everything you say is correct.
      I think that the SNP will not act to remove the boil in their ranks that is giving us identity politics until they are destroyed at the ballot box this year and hopefully in 2026 as well. Only then with oblivion facing them will they do something. If not they may disappear completely. Hard to believe I am thinking this I used to think the party was great.

      Liked by 2 people

  6. is a separate toilet for trans people an acceptable solution as they are possibly more likely to understand and accept the physical differences without embarrassment?

    Harry

    Liked by 1 person

      1. That has been mentioned on a number of occasions and you would imagine that would provide trans people with the level of protection they seek but as you say, that has always been rejected.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. the extremist in the TransCult would never accept that. They want to be in Women’s spaces because that is victory. The same applies to Sport….why be the 600th ranked male swimmer when you can be a World champion in Women’s Sport?
      The TransCult is a mix of AGP, predators, confused children, genuine confused adults and any new group who want to join the banner. Nobody has any idea what proportion of each and it changes daily.

      however you missed the key point that Schools, Offices, Businesses, leisure centres changed the changing rooms and toilets without asking us.

      The lifestyle of 0.4% are now shaping society. Why does the Government not ask the People what they think.

      My surprise is that the LGB community continue to accept the umbrella organisation that is now run by the Cult who are obviously anti Gay…They demand that gay men accept TransMen and that Lesbians accept TranswoMEN as partners.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. I had a wee boy at my door today. Canvassing on behalf of Chris Murray. Labour. kept him talking for at least 10 minutes. 2 topics. Independence and men in frocks. He was a push over. was hoping for a battle. english accent from NZ

    Liked by 7 people

  8. Help is always appreciated, `of course. However, British institutions tend to be less knowledgeable, far less concerned about Scotland’s real longstanding colonial condition, which may be defined as a people subject to ‘hateful racism’ (Cesaire). Where was respect or support for our rights from any British institution during our enforced Brexit or after several successive electoral mandates in favour of further referendums were all denied by our oppressor?

    Scotland has suffered from imposed oppressive laws and economic and political exploitation for rather a long time, this is nothing new; more coercive laws merely intensify whenever ‘colonialism is imperiled’, and the vote for independence strengthens. Repeal of the HCA will be welcomed, if it occurs, but it is by no means the end of Scotland’s oppression, being merely another in a long line of symptoms of colonialism.

    Liked by 8 people

    1. I agree Alf but the HCA is a step too far as it’s seeks to intimidate free speech. We need to have free speech to explain our colonial status. The level of censorship and controls on pro Indy sites is getting worse by the day.

      Liked by 10 people

      1. Yes Iain, the HCA may indeed seem the thin edge if the wedge; however, the oppressor power can and does turn the screw whenever it wishes, as the persecutions of Craig Murray, Alex Salmond and others has proved.

        Liked by 10 people

  9. Regardless of whether or not I’m ideologically sympathetic to the expressed socio-political views of everyone who is a member of this (or that) particular lobby, I am still inclined to lend my voice in support of our common cause agaisnt tyranny. Surely that’s the whole point?

    Liked by 7 people

  10. A reasonable amount of caution should be exercised, in my opinion, with metropolitan-based organisations headed-up or influenced by hard-core Libertarians such as Toby and Lionel, both establishment-insiders who know, and care even less, about Scotland’s colonisation and the endless negativity of that reality. Liberate everything, excepting the Scottish milch-cow.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. As far as I am concerned they will be judged by their performance in helping Scots defend themselves and free speech in Scotland. That is the prime consideration from me. I think freedom of speech is absolutely crucial to Independence as well. How do we win it without it?

      Liked by 3 people

  11. Sorry, Iain, I felt inclined to join and contribute until I saw the names Toby Young and Rachel McLean. Never ever get into bed with these right wing extremists. They will use you to push their far right views. They are in favour of free speech for neoliberals and nobody else. Look at where their activities are in England.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You are right to make your own choice. I accept not everyone feels as strongly as I do about free speech. I am strongly against authoritarian Government. I visited East Berlin before the wall came down and operated a business for many years in Estonia where I have many friends who endured life under the Soviet Union. They will tell you what freedom of speech means to them. As I stated earlier the FSU need to demonstrate that they will defend and support Scots, if they do that I will continue to be a member, if not then I will leave. Seems simple enough to me.

      Liked by 4 people

  12. The ambivalence and – in some cases – outright rejection of the FSU because of the socio/political orientation of it’s founders and key member is illustrative of the shifting sands of our hitherto unambiguous ethical perceptions .

    Yes ..” We Need To Talk About Toby/Rachel/Lionel ” and all the so-called ” Libertarian ” Right , who , as remarked , above , couldn’t care less about Scotland , are hostile to the idea of Independence and whose views on most things are anathema to most of here . But the issue of freedom of speech/thought transcends all such differences of political opinion – or should . If this makes for strange bedfellows and unlikely alliances , so be it .

    It’s been the bitterest pill to swallow that since the Covid fiasco ( actually , well before then , but brought into sharp relief by that scenario ) eg the psychologically brutal , totalitarian exclusion/suppression of all opinion – inc completely credible Scientific opinion – that challenged the * official * narrative , it’s been Right commentators who have consistently questioned and applied critical thought to State/Establishment attempts to bludgeon the public into unquestioning compliance . The Left have been nowhere to be seen , in fact , have been amongst the strongest advocates of shutting down dissent .

    I never thought I’d see the day when I would find myself admiring and in agreement with people like Neil Oliver , but , on the issues we’re talking about here , I do and I am .

    What’s a stake , for all of us , is too important to be sacrificed on the alter of our personal opinions/feelings about others ; just a pity we couldn’t have our own Scottish FSU ; though , on this issue , the efficacy of any ” Resistance Movement ” will be enhanced by the widest possible participation .

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.