IT IS UNIONISTS WHO WILL MATTER MOST.

Jim SILLARS along with his editor Calum Miller have restarted the Yes Think website. This is the first essay.

It is the Unionists who will matter most

A successful independence campaign lies not in convincing ourselves, but  in exposing to unionists that the “strong” UK they believe in is  a myth

By Jim Sillars

The independence movement is alive, but not kicking. It is split – SNP/Alba, and splintered, with, at the latest count, ten organisations doing their own thing: mostly self-confirming reasons why they support independence. There is no main coherent message, and there has been no unified national campaign since 2014.   There does not seem to be an understanding that the people who matter most are not ourselves, but the unionists without whose conversion we cannot win. 

There is a case to be presented to our fellow unionist citizens, a compelling case. The question is whether the SNP leadership and membership is able to make the case alone, or whether it can scramble out of its sectarian trench and co-operate with others to do so.  

The current SNP leadership, and membership, continues to believe it has a proprietorial right to the movement. It and it alone must lead. But it is clueless.  It produces papers purporting to describe an independent Scotland that are quickly forgotten. There is no energy, no dynamic.  Its main message is to bleat about the wickedness of Westminster’s refusal to grant another referendum.  The latest Humza cry to make Scotland a Tory free zone is emblematic of a party thrashing around in a political vacuum of its own making. No one in Downing Street, or its likely next occupant, is afraid of a Humza Yousaf led SNP.   I read the English papers, where the SNP is now regarded with contempt, and a sure fire belief that the day of independence being important is over.  

Of course, those English commentators make the mistake of seeing the SNP and independence as one and the same. In a recent column in the Daily Telegraph Alan Cochrane, noting the mess the SNP government is in, wondered how a poll could still show 47 per cent favouring independence.  He didn’t think this was real, just “bravado” on the part of some Scots. But it is real, and for a reason which I have picked up talking to people: they are realising that the economic and political shambles that is now the UK, where nothing works,  is not a passing phase  that can be corrected by replacing Sunak with Starmer, but something deeper and permanent.

We are at a seminal moment: if we make it so

It is now plain: the UK is a “poor country pretending to be rich” as one headline in the Daily Telegraph declared. This is the open goal. We have to persuade unionists see the UK for what it has now become, and help them understand that if Scotland is to avoid a  future of continued decline and getting poorer, then they along with the rest of us  need to  escape by becoming  independent.  

The UK presented to Scotland in  2014, and believed as true by unionists,  is profoundly different than the one we see in 2024.  And it is this change that presents the great opportunity for us in the movement to not to swear at, not to insult, but to talk calmly and rationally to our fellow unionist citizens, and explain that the UK they believed in was a myth, now exposed as such.   

Another fact we have to drive home is that Scotland cannot reverse the UK’s decline. Five million people cannot save sixty million people.  

Explaining that decline and why Scotland should escape from it is the campaign that should now be our priority. There is an abundance of evidence to prove it. 

Let me put on record that I do not find any pleasure in identifying the decline, nor in the cruel economic and social consequences it will bring upon a very large number of people in England.  Geography binds us together on this island, and England will always be a factor in how Scotland handles its independence and its relations with others.  I don’t see a happy future for England’s people, because its elite’s imperial hangover prevents it from seeing what is really happening, until it will be too late to reverse course. 

In 2014 the unionist case was that small Scotland had to shelter under the umbrella of an economically strong, powerful UK, politically highly influential in the world community. The boast was that the UK was a Tier 1 economy with a Tier 1 military. Coming out from under that umbrella was, the majority of Scotland’s voters believed, not sensible. No one can see that as true now. 

UK Decline: all the signs are there

My files have a number of articles by heavy weight  economic and political commentators  highlighting the decline. Here are a few of the most recent. “Britain is fast becoming a failed state,” Camila Tominey Daily Telegraph 2nd. March 2024. “Labour can’t fix broken Britain,” Neil Mackay The Herald 22nd February 2024. And the doyen of them all Andrew Neil “There is a growing sense that we are a country in decline and our political masters don’t know what to do about it. I fear what might be to come.” Daily Mail 2nd March 2024. 

There have been three periods of UK decline. The first started around 1850 when both Germany and the United States began to create superior economies. That caused problems in the early  20th century but was not fatal, as the British state’s power rested upon an empire.  The second was after 1945 when the expense of the war led to serious debt and reliance on onerous US  loans. That period covered most of my life, and was marked by repeated economic crises. The senior ranks of the civil service were open about what they saw as their primary duty: managing the decline, as the UK slid down the economic league table from 2nd. To 4th. then 5th. and now 6th. While the  Mandarins faced reality,  the politicians promised that it wasn’t true. Margaret Thatcher believed she had stopped and reversed the decline, but what she really had was decline hidden by the wealth pouring out of the North Sea. Once she had gone, the reality re-emerged. 

The third decline, which we are now experiencing is no longer a manageable one, because the UK  received two severe major shocks which a vulnerable economy  was ill equipped to deal with, and recover from. First there was the 2008 international financial crisis, met by Quantitative Easing, printing vast amounts of money which inflated the assets of the already rich minority,  while it  did nothing for growth and productivity, with poverty and wage stagnation the fate of the majority.  The second was the mishandling of the pandemic, when the decision for prolonged lock downs trashed the economy. 

Mishandling the pandemic is not hindsight on my part.  The first lock down was supposed to be a short one while the scientists got a grip on the nature of the virus. Right at the start the Chinese gave two pieces of information: the gnome of the virus for the scientists, and for the politicians that the over 70s were the main age group in danger, with younger people resistant to fatal consequences. I was among a minority, having listened to and read eminent epidemiologists, who opposed further lockdowns. Given that the threat to the over 70s was a known, it is astonishing that the care homes, where the over 70s gather, was not a priority.  But that is a matter for another day. 

The economy was trashed and has not recovered. The debt consequence, the level of taxes, the  failure to get growth, continued low productivity, falling living standards, the widespread need for food banks, and the damage to the education of children, places the UK in that category of a poor country pretending to be rich.  The UK does not earn its living, and survives on a giant international credit card (called selling government debt bonds) the interest on which becomes the Treasury’s first payment before the NHS, and all other departmental expenditure. We have even witnessed employment of a banana republic trick, of the Bank of England, a government body, buying its own government debt. 

UK budget deficit – the difference between what is taken in tax and what is spent – was £90bn in  2008-9.  In 2022-23 it was £132bn, with total debt now heading towards £3 trillion. The interest payments from last year’s budget was £94bn, more than was spent on education (£81.4bn) and defence (£32.4bn). 

Instead of being autonomous, in full powerful control of key government decisions, the Prime Minister and his Chancellor are monitored, and if necessary controlled, and can be brought down, by those who lend them money.  That was the hard lesson dished out to Liz Truss.  That is not the fate of a real powerful state, but of a decaying and declining one.  

Another more human sign of decline is the inability even of many who work to feed themselves and their families.  The rise in the number of Trussell Trust’s food banks are an unmistakeable sign of economic and social decline. Between 2005 and 2008,  it had very few food banks, and they were mainly for people who found themselves on the streets, or the few in dire straits.  Now the Trussell Trust operates 1,400 while independents have created another 1,172.  Food banks are now an  essential part of the social security system. They give the lie to the UK being rich and powerful. 

Institutional Decay and Decline

All states rest upon their institutions. The British state’s principal one’s are: monarchy, parliament, civil  service, military, police, independent judges,  Church of England (it is has the principal religious role compared to other denominations),  local government, universities, justiciary. . Allied to strong indigenous economic structures, these are what gave it the inherent strength to exercise power in years gone by.   Each now is in a state of decay.

Monarchy. Mystic, reverence and religious allegiance are three factors that have been essential in cementing monarchy in the British constitution. The monarch and close family need to be perceived as on a unique level of humanity to sustain a system that is fundamentally absurd in a democratic age. But once let the light in, the mystic is gone. The old Queen kept the shades down for many years, but in the end the magic melted, and we can all see that what we have, in reality, is a soap opera.  Cries of “not my king,” would once have been unthinkable.  Monarchy will linger on, but its influence and relevance will continue to decline. 

Parliament.  It is no longer peopled by politicians of high quality. The respect it once commanded is gone. That a Speaker should have folded to opposition pressure, and fear of outside influences, as happened recently, speaks volumes for its diminished reputation. We may look with amazement at the Biden v Trump choice in the USA, but on our own patch the most likely outcome of the Sunak v Starmer contest this year will be a very low turnout, with a growing number of people having lost faith in the system. 

Civil Service. Once, correctly, described as the Rolls Royce of administrations,  admired worldwide for its political neutrality and effectiveness, now deliberately blocs ministerial policy, leaks confidential documents, and is a machine  which finds it hard to make anything work. The words “unfit for purpose” apply to a number of its main departments. 

Military. The army is now small and getting smaller. In the first Gulf war, to liberate Kuwait, it could put a division into the battle. Today it can only offer its allies a Brigade. It does not have the ability to defend this island. The Royal Navy has two aircraft carriers which have fewer aircraft available than some of the National Guards of some US states. They cannot form two carrier battle groups because there are not enough anti-aircraft, anti-drone,  and anti-submarine destroyers and frigates to form their defensive protection.  It is now questionable whether the Trident missile system would work if required.  The RAF, like the army on the ground, it is not capable of defending the skies above us.  Pilots are being trained abroad in Italy and USA because half the training fleet is out of action. The UK today is incapable of mounting the kind of operation that defeated the Argentinians in the Falklands. 

Police. The Metropolitan Police, the Scotland Yard that once elicited respect and admiration, and was the inspiration of so many detective novels and films about its expertise and reliability, is now more noted for its endemic failures, its officers’ misbehaviour, and worse, and failure to apply the law. Police are no better outside of London. Confidence in them has collapsed.   

Church of England. This has been one of the bastions of the UK constitution. It has official status, with representation in the House of Lords as of right.  It is now hollowed out. Its churches empty. Its pronouncements and divisions reflecting its now salient weakness: it is in a theological muddle. 

Local Government.  This was once the most effective instrument in the delivery of public services to the population. Parliament might legislate, but it was the local authorities who made that legislation work, and so was recognised one of the major state institutions.  Today it is weak and, in some major ones, broken, bankrupt and slashing essential services; and without hope of restoring its former position. 

Universities. These were at the height of British dominance great independent institutions of learning, from which emerged a high quality of political leadership.  Their doors were not open to the vast majority of the people, but those they did teach they did teach well, and their independence was based upon the wealth generated by a successful indigenous economy.  Since the 1990s there are more of them, but they are not all of the same academic standing. But what marks them out from the past, and this includes those of high academic status, is their reliance on government finance for the cohort who are British, and ever more growing numbers who are foreign without whose fees they would be in serious financial trouble.  Were India and China to decide their students should go elsewhere, the weakness of this institutional pillar would be laid bare. 

Independent Judges and the justice system. There have been over the years convictions of innocent people on the most serious  crimes and, as we have seen recently hundreds of law abiding sub-post office holders ruined.  That has not, however, been the fault of the judges, but of the criminal justice system. While the justice system continues to fail, with people waiting years for trials and justice, that the judges remain independent is the one small gleam of light in the UK darkness. 

Indigenous economic strength?  The economic output of manufacturing, 27 per cent in 1970,  fell   to 17 per cent in 1990, and reached only 10 per cent in 2023. Major components of the economy are foreign owned: water companies, energy companies, airports, transport, and it is the French who are building the new nuclear power station at Hinckley C.  Trade, the difference between what is exported and imported, have been in deficit every year since 1998. The economy runs on consumers buying, but with too many in low wages and relying on credit cards, personal debt is 126 per cent of household income.  

Influence? The imperial mind set of “What we say as the UK matters in the world ”still  exists in Whitehall where  it clings on to the permanent seat on the UN Security Council, while the international community sees it as a small off-shore island of Europe, clinging to the coattails of America, whose views carry no independent weight in the councils of rising powers like China, India, Indonesia, Brazil and the African state organisations. 

When stripped of the veils unionist politicians cast over the UK, what is there to be seen is post-imperial failure: a state skint, broken and always on the brink, and often into, economic crisis. 

The immediate task for the independence movement:  reveal UK irreversible decline

The independence movement, as represented by the SNP,  has spent much political capital on how an independent Scotland would work economically and what kind of social system would be built upon it.  A problem we face with that in recent years has been the poor performance of the SNP in devolved government. It is difficult for unionists, seeking reasons for holding on to their beliefs, to be convinced of our vision of a successful Scotland when what they see from the independence party in government, is levels of incompetence and mediocrity that are embarrassing. Until the SNP membership has the intellectual courage to admit that, and do something about it, unionist eyes will refuse to see the bright future forecast.  Perhaps the electorate will send the members that uncomfortable message later this year. 

In the meantime, the rest of the movement should concentrate on eroding the unionist mind’s belief in the UK as Scotland’s safeguard,  by setting out the reality of its irreversible damaging decline. That is stage one of winning them over. The facts are, and indisputable. 

MY COMMENTS

Great to hear about another pro Indy website, especially one being organised and run by Jim and Calum, two old time friends of mine. We can be sure it will provide interesting reading, challenging at times with very little verbal padding. Here is the link for future articles http://www.yesthink.scot

I am, as always

YOURS FOR SCOTLAND

BEAT THE CENSORS

Unfortunately there are some sites where extensive blocking takes place against bloggers who do not slavishly follow the dictates of one political party. This is a direct threat to freedom of speech and I unhesitatingly condemn such action. To overcome this problem I rely on my readers to share Yours for Scotland articles as widely as possible. My thanks to those who help overcome censorship.

FREE SUBSCRIPTIONS
The most reliable way to get articles from this site is by taking out a free subscription which are available on the Home and Blog pages of the Yours for Scotland website. Given that I often seem to face other problems with both Twitter and Facebook this guarantees that my content is freely available.

SALVO

Salvo continues to do valuable work and an ever increasing number of people are involved. They are now running strong campaigns on several key issues and as the campaigning arm of Liberation.Scot they are the key to success. If you would like to make a donation to further Salvo and Liberation’s campaigning here are the details. All donations large or small greatly helps our work.

BANK RBS

ACCOUNT SALVOSCOT LTD

Ac number 00779437

Sort Code 83-22-26

LIBERATION.SCOT

If you have not already joined please visit the above website and join now. We are looking to achieve a membership larger than any other political organisation in Scotland to approach the UN to achieve the official status as Scotland’s Liberation Movement intent of removing the colonising forces from our nation. Be part of it.

42 thoughts on “IT IS UNIONISTS WHO WILL MATTER MOST.

  1. This should be essential reading for everyone who professes to campaign for Independence.

    Delivering a copy of that to every home in Scotland without any pro independence branding would be a start to the conversations we must have.

    Although one can attack some SNP policies, it is a fact that on virtually every policy area, the English do not enjoy the rights, benefits and opportunities we enjoy in Scotland under an SNP government. These rights obscure the decline but they certainly ease it.

    As part of the conversation is the easy introductory question , why do the English not have these rights, etc. which we enjoy?

    Liked by 6 people

  2. This article gives an extensive critique of the busted imperial flush that the UK is.

    Decline is absolutely all around, but not that the Westminster blimps would have you know. Post Brexit glory. A UK projecting economic and military presence on to the world stage is rather the message.

    Walter Mitty land and we tied ourselves to the sinking stone. And now the reality sinks in as declining living standards become clear to all.

    And it will get worse as we divert more of our resources to military activities with military personnel and resources active in not just Ukraine but in Israel and various other middle Eastern countries.

    Wars cost money. Wars cost lives, .money and lives that we cannot afford. And morally too, militarily supporting Israel in its persecution and slaughter of Palestinians. But we don’t talk about that, or at least the blimps try to stop talk about that.

    Yes millions cold in their homes unable to afford heating whilst children and babies die in Gaza at the hands of a UK supported IDF.

    Jim Sillar’s piece this Sunday morning truly summarises the foul evil declining burst ball that we, and I say we, have become.

    Enjoy mother’s day.

    Liked by 10 people

    1. Willie I just posted this on WOS which I think is relative

      TBQH I was not impressed or motivated by Alex’s interview of Stu and his, Alex’s comments about independence, TBQH again I felt there was and is no urgency,fire or passion in his interview,I felt the whole thing was stage managed and lukewarm , it was more about tepidly highlighting the ongoing incompetence of the Scum Nonce Party and it’s governance of Scotland as if we weren’t already aware of it,forgetting or refusing to acknowledge that he had been literally begging the Scum Nonce Party to unite with ALBA for months whilst simultaneously being ridiculed and denigrated by sturgeon and her puppet useless.

      Alex is and has always been an establishment figure and will only fight for independence through establishment procedures and pathways so a radical no holds barred fight for independence would be anathema to him

      To all the usual suspects claiming that if Scots “were shown the fucking money” indy would be a shoe in , please bear in mind that both Alex Salmond and the poisoned dwarf sturgeon were both in charge of the independence movement and NEITHER of them produced ANY INFORMATION or documentation to encourage people that their financial futures were secure or beneficial, NEITHER of them produced any information or evidence of the FINANCES that were being STOLEN from Scotland and Scots, BOTH of them agreed with the mutilated GERS figures and signed off on them when they were FM,Scots were PROMISED revised TRUE GERS figures that would expose the theft and corruption of Scotland’s resources, am I the only one that HASN’T seen them, is there some reason that Salmond and sturgeon didn’t produce them when that info could have led to independence

      Liked by 4 people

  3. Close (close-ish) to the mark; more so in the description of the manifestations of decline than in the analysis – it takes a profound blindness not to include Brexit in the “shocks” and his understanding of economics is kinda sketchy – but he’s right in general and especially about the need to open unionists’ eyes to the realities of the UK’s decline.

    Unfortunately the SNP is MIA on that score…

    Liked by 8 people

  4. “A problem we face with that in recent years has been the poor performance of the SNP in devolved government.” Very droll.

    It’s not a problem, it is a long drawn out miserable disaster.

    The only prospect for the worthwhile and successful independence of Scotland would be the SNP having nothing to do with it.

    Liked by 15 people

      1. You miss the point!! Politics and politicians would all have to start again and try to get elected on their new propositions.

        Liked by 6 people

  5. Jim Sillars is usually thought-provoking and this article is very much in keeping.

    He could maybe call it The Decline and Fall of the British Empire.

    It is true that ultimately people have to be brought over from the Dark Side. But which people? Who is it that can be convinced?

    I reckon that the bulk of those types who inhabit the likes of posh Morningside and Grange or well to do Kelvinside are pretty much a lost cause. They are generally comfortable, middle class, many incoming from South of the Gretna-Berwick line and emotionally attached to the Union.

    More likely it is those who support the Union but suffer worst under its auspices are the folk that should be targeted.

    Probably some work has to be done to investigate who are the potential ‘convertibles” in order to reach an audience effectively and efficiently.

    I’m going to check the website out.

    Liked by 7 people

  6. Jim Sillard is 100% incorrect in my view. Unionists are of no real significance it is indiginous Scots who matter and only they should be allowed a vote on Scottish Issues. Not every Tom Dick and Harry who take up residence here.
    One VERY important Question for Jim Sillard to andwer is:-
    From whom is the Government borrowing money??
    He should read the Defecit Myth by prof S. Kelton.

    Liked by 7 people

  7. I would disagree. We have to Unite before we can win others. You do not attract converts by offering 10 options or flavours.

    We were United between 2012 and 2014 with the common goal of Independence and winning the Power for US to shape our future. Had the Momentum of 2014 been maintained we would be Independent today.

    The Key issue is that far too many “leaders”, “thinkers”, “Politicians” do not want to give power to the little people. They want to decide for them.

    We only have to look at the Poll result in Ireland yesterday to be reminded of that.

    Independence is simply recovering the Right for the Sovereign People of Scotland to decide. It should be obvious that includes the Right to change their mind on any topic at any time.

    The problem is that the Political Class want to control that journey.

    We should not be debating TransCult, Foreign Policy, EU Membership, Tories Out etc etc. Every single main issue will remain a UK decision until we are Independent.

    A Tory and a SSP Member should be able to agree on Independence AND hold opposing views on everything else. I firmly believe that every Political view should be represented in Holyrood. Holyrood should be a representation of US.

    Scotland will, and should not, be shaped by Political Parties or wealthy individuals. It should not have caveats placed on the next generation by the generation that wins Indy.

    The Division must be resolved first. We need to return to winning Independence to enable future generations to decide a future, and change direction if they wish.

    I am sick of Politicians telling me I MUST support the EU, TransCult Ideology, Nuclear Energy, NATO etc etc NOT because I disagree but because it is irrelevant until you have the Power and the Right to implement change.

    The Independents for Independence is the first glimmer of hope I have seen for a decade. It reminds me of the YES Movement of 2014.

    Indy4Indy, AUOB……..We have to move away from the Politics of our Coloniser and not turn Holyrood into a mini UK.

    The People are Sovereign and they need to shock the Political Class by reminding them of that.

    No more voting for Rosettes…..vote for good people. Those like Eva and Neale Hanvey. Look past tribal Politics which is now full of troughers.

    What went wrong in 2014…….we gave the campaign back to politicians.

    Liked by 16 people

    1. I agree with everything you say Clootie. 100%.
      What JS does in this article is show in summary by each UK State department how it is a downward spiral with lost focus, extremely poor governance etc. By putting emphasis on this it is a tool to show that the broad shoulders of the U.K. is an illusion.
      You view which is the same as mine allows us to use both futures, one of decline and one of hope and aspiration to swing people to our cause. Getting them to listen is another issue entirely.

      Liked by 11 people

      1. To add to my last sentence above. I am giving a talk soon to two Probus groups one in Edinburgh and one in Perth. I find it scary that in both cases the President of the groups are scared to allow presentations on topics that unionists may find against their belief system.

        Liked by 7 people

      2. on you probus talk….

        Watch “Dragons Den” and listen to Entrepreneurs telling those bidding for money that they must move manufacturing to the Far East and cut unit cost.
        Dyson did this while screaming for Brexit.
        They all look at the profit margin in their one business. Their OWN investment.
        When we were starting up Oil & Gas Production in the North Sea we robbed the Shipyards, Coal Mines, Heavy Industry, Merchant Navy of its skill base.

        a) If every company moves manufacturing abroad….who is going to have the money to buy what is made.

        b) Every business you shutdown and fire people here costs another 7 to 10 jobs in the area.

        c) Once you lose your skill base….who is going to train the next and future generations?

        d) when you wipe out Steel Production, Ship Building, Merchant Navy etc it is never “viable” to start again.

        When Grangemouth closes we lose the ability to refine crude, we lose skills, we lose the sub-contractors who work their, the pubs, restaurants, sandwich bars etc etc all suffer.

        Then it will be Water……..then we are a service industry.

        I want future generations to have more than subsistence incomes. I want a circular economy where people have pride in their skills and the money cycles back into the community not sent to other Counties.

        That £10 product you buy on Amazon from China cost £1 to make and the person who made it gets pennies. We need to educate people about the real cost here and abroad of the “Dyson Model”

        Liked by 11 people

    2. Very helpful article and gets added to my numerous others from various blogs that could be helpful later. However, I do agree with Clootie that we made a fundamental error in allowing politicians and political parties to take forward what had been achieved by the people coming together.

      Of course, it’s easy with hindsight and political parties played their part but without the people coming together despite what differences we may have had at that time, we would not have had anywhere close to the result that scared Westminster so much that they will NEVER allow another referendum and any party or politician that thinks somehow, sometime, somebody will unlock that door is either mistaken, delusional or both.

      That’s one of the many reasons why Salvo is non-party and will never become attached to one – all are welcome whether a party member or non-party just bring your skills experience and belief in Scotland with you.

      I believe the Liberation Scotland Committee application forms will be available later this week to take forward the Liberation Scotland Movement for registration with the UN. Information now available illustrates that registration is a much easier process than once believed and given the UK State’s current pariah status internationally it’s getting easier by the day.

      Clootie has mentioned one of my biggest fears when he said we must “not turn Holyrood into a mini UK.” Make no mistake, the party Leaders, with the notable exception of Colette Walker of the ISP, would be happy if come Independence Day that it was “business as usual” with the same old confrontational politics and Parliamentary Sovereignty we have today.

      As the GE nears, we will hear more and more from then about how “The People of Scotland are Sovereign”. Of course they are right, but they also believe that our sovereignty comes around once every 5 years and then the people loan their sovereignty to their elected representatives.

      Well, it’s long past the time for the people of Scotland to call in that loan!

      Finally, I agree with Iain that it is great news that there is to be another pro-independence website and looking forward to subscribing.

      Liked by 8 people

  8. An excellent social, political and economic analysis of overall UK decline by Jim Sillars.

    However, I am not so sure it deals much with Scotland’s imposed social inequality and economic exploitation (within the ‘UK Internal Colonialism Model’) due to our continued colonial ‘condition’ as a social, political, and economic reality within that context of overall UK decline; nor does it explain the momentum for Scotland’s independence from the UK which is dependent on ‘the solidarity of the oppressed ethnic group’.

    Postcolonial theorists tall us that the mistake intellectuals on the Left make in a colonial environment is to think of independence simply as a matter of Left or Right, of Socialism versus Capitalism. This ignores the essential reality of colonialism as a racist and exploitative ideology based also on psychology.

    For example, in a colonial society, when trying to convince some No voters to vote Yes, where does ‘ideology and values’, which remain the key colonizer influence on an ‘assimilated’ people, and hence not economic factors, come into the picture?

    Liked by 10 people

    1. Agreed, Alf. Another way of asking the question ‘when do ideology and values… and hence not economic factors, come into the picture’ is: when will a politician make the case for liberating Scotland in a positive and imaginative way, instead of denaturing it with a colourless economistic sensibility. The answer is: never.

      The dismantling of the colonial paradigm is not principally about our jumping ship to escape the ‘UK’s inevitable decline’ – or reviving Salmond’s assembly line nationalism to bring that about. It is about creating a new sensibility. The truth is our politicans and ‘influencers’ are feart witless to even mention clear-cut cultural, social, historical and other differences between the colonisers and the colonised, let alone insist that the ‘cultural requirements’ of the colonisers – which shape the colonial mindset – must be supplanted by a confident cultural Scottishness.

      That confident Scottishness is the key to – and an outcome of – everything that ‘post-colonialism’ promises for Scotland. It is, by definition, first of all a question of identity, thus a matter of recovering what MacCaig calls “hidden things” – all the territory, including the cultural, moral and psychic, that has been ceded over three hundred years.

      Our professional political class avoids the ‘question of identity’ like the plague, fearing that, as Stuart Hall puts it, they “would release strange demons from the deep, and that these monsters might come trailing all sorts of subterranean material” – but that subterranean material is exactly what we require. Making sense of it, and acting on it, is the way to halt Scotland’s galloping peripheralisation.

      In An Tiona (given in English by Ciaran Carson) Pàdraig MacAoidh speaks of the little flat tin he had as a schoolboy, in which he stashed his words “writ on splinters of paper”

      what I remember is not the design
      but how difficult it was to open
      without names and deeds leaping out
      like salmon from a net

      the dumb babble of my languages
      forever swimming towards their lost ground
      the tin in my head rusting not to be opened
      without breaking its crust of salt.

      If ‘post-colonialism’ has any meaning in Scotland it is about swimming towards our lost ground, and real ambition for our future.

      If there is a message for those who are nervous or unconvinced, or whatever, it is not to fear being dragged down by a wounded and flailing British state – it is ‘open the tin’.

      *

      Here is An Tiona, in full, for Gaelic readers who are not aware of it, and everyone else

      Nuair a bha mi sa bhun-sgoil
      fhuair mi tiona sleamhainn tana
      far an cuirinn m’ fhaclan
      sgrìobhte air sgoltaidhean pàipeir.

      Chan eil cuimhne agam air inneach
      ach air cho doirbh ’s a bha e fhosgladh
      gun ainmearean ’s gnìomhairean a’ leum
      a-mach às mar bhradain à lìon –

      iorghail bhalbh mo chànain
      a’ snàmh gu sìorraidh gu dachaigh chaillte.
      Nam cheann tha an tiona air meirgeadh,
      ’s cha tèid fhosgladh gun bhristeadh saillte.

      (from Gu Leòr | Galore published by Acair in 2015)

      Liked by 7 people

      1. gun ainmearean ’s gnìomhairean a’ leum
        a-mach às mar bhradain à lìon –

        iorghail bhalbh mo chànain

        a’ snàmh gu sìorraidh gu dachaigh chaillte.

        (Respectful) possible variant English of above lines —

        without nouns and verbs leaping out

        like salmon from a net —

        Voiceless distress of my language

        Swimming on forever homeless.

        Liked by 4 people

      2. Hello Fearghas – your translation brings a sharper focus to MacAoidh’s beautiful dose of hopelessness. It also gives an insight into the complex articulations at work in this poem about language and loss, and why translation is an art in itself.

        The paragraph after the poem should have read

        If ‘post-colonialism’ has any meaning in Scotland it is about swimming towards our lost ground, with real hope, and real ambition for our future.

        Which makes more sense.

        I persist in using an old phone – because I like its physical keyboard – but it has a mind of its own when it comes to edits, and not everything gets through.

        Maybe this time.

        Mile thaing.

        Liked by 5 people

  9. A substantial article by Jim Sillars that I only partially agree with.
    ‘Reading between the Lines’, I conclude that Jim’s understanding of Government finance and money is of the mainstream theory that must be eradicated from institutional education. He needs to read up on ‘Economic Realities’.
    Economic policy of ‘Budgetary Deficits’ are good for the economy because the extra expenditure remains in the ‘Private Sector’ (Households and Business) and drives spending on products and industrial outputs. It grows the GDP of the nation’s economy.
    Additionally, after 1945 the UK economy thrived until 1973-5 when Thatcher and the ‘Monetarist’ ideology from Hayek and Friedman became the UK Government policy of non-government financial investment and unemployment.
    The lack of government expenditure into any sovereign Nation-State’s economy is the singular reason why countries economies FAIL. Without expenditure there will be no growth.

    All government economic failures are based on erroneous policy decisions.

    Neil🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

    Liked by 7 people

    1. I completely agree. Thatcherite ideology is totally blind to how economies are interconnected. It is narrow and has espoused a segment of how economies work to the detriment of everything else. Even now the rentier economy resulting from its abject failure is sucking what’s left dry.

      The only way Scotland has a slim chance of recovering is to become independent. I wonder how much trade we will be able to afford with England who may not be able to pay.

      And now we begin to hear the hawks say we must fight Russia. Macron has suggested that Nato should mobilise and join.

      The british would love that also. The only way left for abject scoundrels to cling to their diminished power? Jack up the rhetorical need for a good??? war.

      Jeezus f’ing chri.

      Liked by 7 people

      1. Put it another way then jistr. They may not wish to pay and will certainly fight for years not to. they will try and tie us up in contractual knots as they have already done. and it may cost us a lot to remove them. Whats the difference.

        Liked by 2 people

      2. what are you talking about???? A currency issuing country can pay for whatever it likes. England does not need the wealth it plunders from Scotland. It just wants it.

        Liked by 3 people

  10. I wholeheartedly agree, genuine progress can only be achieved by changing minds. The payroll SNP appeals exclusively to the core support to shore up the vote which can lead to nothing but stasis (and that I believe is the end goal rather than an incremental way-station).

    Jim’s penultimate paragraph is key. Many soft Unionists would gnaw off their own arm to avoid cognitive dissonance. If we are to argue on an economic front (at present) the entirely justified repost will be to point at the utter shamble that is the Holyrood, devolved administration.

    I will attribute the promotion of gross incompetents to Ministerial posts to the toxic, cult dynamic that has gripped the SNP since 2014.

    If the economic argument is a barren field to sow, where else should we focus?

    That Scotland and England are in cultural divergence has been evident since the 1970’s when post WWII British patriotism began to wane and a confident, working-class indigenous Scottish identity took form.

    In recent days this divergence has arguably taken a substantial leap. The Anglo American Security State that holds sway over the British MSM is playing an all or nothing game. Security State asset John Woodcock (Lord Walney) has proposed the de facto outlawing of peaceful protest groups such as the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. Woodcock, a notional Labour MP was ennobled by a Tory government and now sits as an independent (his true allegiance has always lain with the Security Services), acting as a government “advisor on political violence” (oh the unintended irony). Woodcock is an unhinged fanatic, his proposals are a threat to functional democracy itself. This road leads eventually to internment camps, something I’m increasingly worried the Security Services are contemplating.

    Desperate to gain traction against Keir Starmer’s Labour Party, the Tories apparently welcome this weaponising of faux “fear”, engendered by mislabelling demonstrations against mass murder and ethnic cleansing as “hate marches”. Ever the bumbling incompetents, the Tories have miscalculated. Having promoted the spectre of “fear” they have reaped panic.

    Reference the graph on the Wiki page, Westminster voting intention, Reform UK have rocketed to third place in UK politics, leading the LibDems by 4% and rising (amusingly at the direct expense of the Tories).

    England is heading inexorably down the route of Permanent State controlled democracy bordering on Fascism. This is anathema to Scotland and is currently the most fruitful line of rhetorical persuasion we should employ with our soft Unionist friends, colleagues, relatives and neighbours.

    Liked by 11 people

  11. “the gnome of the virus for the scientists,”

    Genome! Gnomes are for the garden.

    As ever with Jim there is much fuel for thought, though I don’t agree with everything. The Met police has been problematic for a lot longer than its current troubles. And as another has said, Jim ignores the huge issue of Brexit when accounting for UK’s decline.

    However my largest quibble is probably with the Unionist part of his thesis. Unionists are not a homogenous mass. There are those who no matter how eloquent and persuasive the arguments they would NEVER support an independent Scotland, their country is UK not Scotland (and a number of actual Scots are in this mix, e.g.. Gordon Brown the self described North Briton). Others perhaps we could call them devolutionists are persuadable, they tell themselves devolution is the best of both worlds. If you could persuade them it isn’t, then they could vote/support independence. Call them the soft nos. We need to aim our arguments at the soft nos, not waste time trying to convert the unconvertable.

    Where Jim hits the head on the head is in the poor performance of the SNP and SNP/Greens in government for the past 9/10 years. Like it or not, trying to persuade people to vote Yes and/or support independence when the current government can’t even deliver a census, never mind a ferry, never mind a Grangemouth and talk about a “feminist approach to foreign policy” when as Ash Regan rightly pointed out it’s feminism that is foreign to them – well good luck with that. We need to elect competent people and politicians prove themselves to be incompetent or using independence as a vote catcher rather than an article of faith – they should be shown the door – with alacrity!

    Liked by 9 people

    1. All politicians should be required to PASS a basic IQ test. This lot rode into power on the back of an SNP tsunami and are for the most part money grabbing opportunists who have no clue and to use the old saying “do not have the brains God gave geese”
      Most of them could not command the same salaries in the commercial world I am sorry to say!!!

      Liked by 5 people

      1. They should also have had twenty years in a real job where exposure to real life happens before they can stand for election. They must also swear there allegiance to the people and understand what that means. Oh and tell no lies.

        Liked by 7 people

    2. “We need to elect competent people and politicians”

      In a colonial society it disnae maitter wha is ‘in pouer’ (i.e. indirect power), it will aye still be a colonial administration tasked with making the native look incompetent and unable to govern themselves.

      Alex Salmond did some good things tho mostly on the margins without truly reforming much if anything of real substance: e.g. land, language, energy, housing, media regs, justice, ‘free’ higher educ. but the cap actually limiting access for Scots. He still had to ‘work’ with a UK civil service and other institutions whose main objective was and is to stop Scotland breaking free.

      Colonialism results in a ‘Manichean society’ (Fanon).

      Liked by 7 people

      1. no idea what a manichean society is, nor do I care! I want FREEDOM from colonialism (and this English yoke around our neck) the impostor king and his so called sovereignty over us)
        Salmond got us our chance and we were cheated.

        Liked by 5 people

      2. “it will aye still be a colonial administration tasked with making the native look incompetent and unable to govern themselves.”

        It took it as read we were electing competent people whose main focus was independence and drawing people to our side (as Salmond’s government did) by running a government that wasn’t a clusterboorach! It’s possible to run a government within devolution’s chains whilst pointing out how much better things would be with fully powers of independence. Persuading people to give you full powers when you cannae run a census is a very hard sell!

        Liked by 5 people

  12. Excellent article.

    “There is a case to be presented to our fellow unionist citizens, a compelling case. The question is whether the SNP leadership and membership is able to make the case alone.”

    Here lies the problem in my opinion.

    The SNP government under Sturgeon and now Yousaf as FM’s have made such a pigs ear of governing that it has left a very narrow corridor for us to try and convince unionists that independence is the way forward.

    Unionists can easily point to say the ferries debacle, the GRRB debacle, the Great ScotWind Giveaway, not mention the ongoing investigations into the SNP by Police Scotland. Before all this occurred we’d have a great selling point on independence, and we still do the figures for indy still ad up, but swaying unionists can now point out that the SNP since 2015 haven’t really governed well.

    Some damage has been done and we need very good counters at hand to negate them.

    Liked by 6 people

      1. They have yes, but remarkably those who still support indy still have us hovering around the 50% mark which we can build on if the right people are in place.

        Liked by 4 people

      1. You can win unionist over, Scots voted yes in 2014, which included soft unionists but since Sturgeon and now Yousaf became FM’s they haven’t governed very poorly and like it or not this reflects on the WHOLE indy movement.

        We need to show doubters/unionists (like you say some will never ever be persuaded) most anyway that an indy Scotland will be better (economically etc) than being in the union, it can be done with the right people in place.

        Liked by 5 people

  13. Turning unionists, especially so the imported ones from down south, is like trying to turn the unionists of Northern Ireland to nationalists. The reality is It ain’t going to happen.     

    British unionism is a vicious nasty creed. It secured an empire by oft very foul means which included genocide. It did not lose it’s empire voluntarily and in resisting it used means most foul. In Ireland as recent history has shown it fought a very dirty war and the full extent of the dark deeds of the security services and the military is still to emerge.

    In Scotland the power of the state, is playing hard under the scene. Media control and censorship, infiltration of political parties, manipulation and of course the deliberate encouragement of the influx of people from down south with different values and beholden to the great British state.

    Plantation was the game in Ireland all these years ago and it is no surprise that around 74% of the people who voted no in the referendum were not born in Scotland.

    Against this, does anyone really think that the emigrants from our southern neighbour will e anything but British unionist opponents of Scottish independence. Maybe not a visibly tribal as their cousins in Northern Ireland but British every bit as much for the greatest part.

    In Northern Ireland unionists are being bred out as the demographics change. The apartheid regime may have mellowed but the Brits and their unionist cousins wanted to ditch the internationally agreed Good Friday Agreement. Moreover the UK government allowed the unionists to deny the people of NI the formation of the Devolved Parliament in Stormont, and the UK agreed.

    And so, it is crystal clear why Scots need to speak with one voice on the demand for independence. The political system is corrupted and rigged and the SNP is the example of that, a party that destroyed itself from the inside. Scotland has resources, resources aplenty that England does not have and England wants them. They took oil and gas and Scots unlike Norway, or Qatar, or the UAE gained nothing. And now they take the wind and the water power with eyes on much more to take.

    Yes indeed, these rebellious Scots to crush – but not if we all stand firm and united.

    Liked by 5 people

    1. It is slightly unfair to say the SNP destroyed itself. Its destruction was a well planned and executed programme of subterfuge, lies and infiltration by the English establishment.

      Liked by 1 person

  14. A friend sent me this extract from a book he is reading. It concerns the historic allocation of members to the English/British Parliament:

    « In times past the king had possessed the right to summon this town and that to send up two burgesses to London. Once given that right it usually retained it. If a new town should grow up, the monarch might give it the right, but he was not obliged to. Since 1625 only two new boroughs had been created. Thus the constitution of the House of Commons had become stereotyped at a time when population was increasing and was also shifting greatly from old centers to new. A growing inequality in the representation was a feature of the political system. Thus the county and borough representation of the ten southern counties of England was 237, and of the thirty others only 252; yet the latter had a population nearly three times as large as the former. 

    « All Scotland returned only 45 members, while the single English county of Cornwall (including its boroughs, of course) returned 44. Yet the population of Scotland was eight times as large as that of Cornwall. The suffrage in the counties was uniform, and was enjoyed by those who owned land yielding them an income of forty shillings a year. But as this worked out it gave a very restricted suffrage. The county voters were chiefly the men who had large country estates, and their dependents. Counties in which there were so few voters could be easily controlled by the wealthy landowners. 

    « In all Scotland there were not three thousand county voters; yet the population of Scotland was nearly two millions. Fife had 240 voters, Cromarty 9. The climax was reached in Bute, where there were 21 voters out of a population of 14,000, only one of whom lived in the county. On a certain occasion only one voter attended the election meeting of that county. He constituted himself chairman, nominated himself, called the list of voters, and declared himself elected to Parliament.

    « In the nomination boroughs, the right to choose the two burgesses was completely in the hands of the patron. Such places might have lost all their inhabitants, yet, representation being an attribute of geographical areas rather than of population, these places were still entitled to their two members. Thus Corfe Castle was a ruin, Old Sarum a green mound, Gatton was part of a park, while Dunwich had long been submerged beneath the sea, yet these places, entirely without inhabitants, still had two members each in the House of Commons, because it had been so decided centuries before, when they did have a population, and because the English Parliament took no account of changes. Thus the owner of the ruined wall, or the green mound, or this particular portion of the bottom of the sea, had the right of nomination. »

    (Extract from: ‘THE LONG NINETEENTH CENTURY: A HISTORY OF EUROPE FROM 1789 TO 1918’ by Charles Downer Hazen. Published by e-artnow, Aug 2023. Paperback £15.40)

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.