A DAY OUT IN EDINBURGH.

Don Staniford’s young legal team, who are doing such a sterling job defending the freedoms of real Scottish interests with Don and John D. Campbell KC in the centre and our Ewan Kennedy on the right.

This is an update on the Appeal of Don Staniford heard in Edinburgh last week as he resists attempts by large multinationals to grasp powers over our seas and even over our airspace. Ewan Kennedy, our regular legal eagle, reports.

MOWI versus Staniford. A Day Out in Edinburgh

As a supporting act, I have to be extremely careful not to write anything that could be seen as an attempt to influence the judges, or that could be misconstrued as such by the extremely watchful lawyers on the other side, who haven’t hesitated so far to draw attention to anything they’ve spotted on social media that they didn’t like. With the unlimited resources of a huge multinational behind them, they have plenty of time to read anything one writes about the case. Because of this, it was a great relief to find that one of the main trade journals published a report on the case just hours after we had emerged from the appeal court for our group photograph. Their reporter, Gareth Moore, was sitting just behind me in court, taking copious notes, the kind of respectable, old-style journalist now missing from much of the major newspapers. I reckon he’s done a pretty decent job, and his report can be accessed here:

https://www.fishfarmingexpert.com/don-staniford-mowi-scotland-sheriff-appeal-court/mowi-gives-ground-over-ban-on-activist/1660423

As you’ll see in the report, after several hours of argument by the KCs on both sides, plus some good forensic questioning from the three appeal sheriffs, MOWI abandoned three major parts of their case against Don Staniford. 

First, they have given up on trying to create fifteen metre exclusion zones around their fish farms. In essence, had they managed to do this they would have privatised sections of the ever changing, ever moving surface of the water that ebbs and flows along the west coast. For sure there are sections of the sea, such as around Faslane, where the Westminster Government has legislated to keep us away from the nuclear submarines, but from the outset of this case our team have never believed that a Scottish court would put a giant Norwegian battery farmer in the same position. Under the detailed scrutiny the case got on 1 February, MOWI accepted the legal reality and gave up.

Second, they have abandoned their attempt to obtain an order against Don Staniford from flying drones over their farms and taking photographs. This would have prohibited him, and by extension anyone else with an interest, from capturing images of what’s going on. It’s a simple matter of fact that Don has never owned or operated a drone, and because of this his answer to this part of the case was a blunt denial. Ignoring his offer to prove this, the Oban sheriff had nonetheless granted an interdict against him. Had the order stayed in place, there’s no doubt that steps would have been taken to prevent others from using this entirely safe and legal way of exposing, for example, the appalling mortalities in our waters, with tens of millions of mature salmon taken off for disposal by road as toxic waste each year.

The operation of drones is something that has exercised the attention of government, and there are very clear rules about them, whether used for commercial, recreational, or, as here, environmental purposes. We are not allowed to infringe other people’s rights to privacy, for example. Once again, excluding environmentalists uniquely, from an activity anyone else can carry on within the law, seemed legally unsustainable to our team.

Thirdly, MOWI agreed to what might look like a technical change of wording in the part of the case that remains active. Don Staniford has freely admitted kayaking out to fish farms and climbing onto the walkways to take photographs. MOWI do not aver that he has caused any damage in the course of doing this. He has sent the results, where appropriate, to the police and governmental agencies and has published them for years on social media and in the press. The part of the case that remains live concerns whether or not the ownership of private property trumps his claimed right to observe and report on things like animal cruelty. 

MOWI were seeking an order stopping Don not only from doing this himself, but also from “encouraging others” to do so. The significance of this becomes clear when we reflect that a permanent interdict effectively creates a personalised criminal offence, violation of which can result in an immediate sentence of imprisonment, completely without the usual safeguards of background, health and social work reports. I don’t need to remind readers of this site of recent cases where people have been imprisoned in Scotland in similar circumstances. To put anyone in a situation where he could be jailed for what might simply be a social chat with a third party would be simply monstrous. During yesterday’s hearing, MOWI’s counsel agreed to drop these words from the remaining part of the case.

We now await the ruling on this remaining issue, which can be expected in about six weeks.

It’s unfortunate that this case has now been hanging over Don’s head since late 2021, and huge thanks are due to our wonderful group of professional lawyers, who have put in hundreds of hours of work with no expectation of a proper reward. At one point during the hearing, MOWI’s counsel, Jonathan Barne KC,  suggested that the reason the lawyers wanted to get a hearing in Oban was to help raise publicity for Don Staniford. His counsel, John D Campbell KC, very politely replied that that was something his client is well able to do himself. He has been recognised internationally for his efforts and his images and data are currently featuring almost daily in the national press. 

Don has a crowdfunder to help pay for his mounting legal costs. If you can find a few pounds here are the details https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/stop-mowi-privatising-public-waters-in-scotland/


MY COMMENTS

I am indebted to Ewan Kennedy for keeping my readers up to date with all the key developments in this important case. Having been disappointed with the initial outcome at the first hearing in Oban Sheriff Court I am heartened that the Appeal has already forced the giant multinational to withdraw a number of measures that were clearly an infringement of not only Don Staniford’s rights but also everyone in Scotland.

. Here giant multinational companies are trying to use the law to eliminate Don Staniford speaking out about abuses that his investigations discover. Abuses that often reveal cruelty, pollution and several other real problems. Don deserves the support of us all.

I am, as always

Yours for Scotland

BEAT THE CENSORS

Unfortunately there are some sites where extensive blocking takes place against bloggers who do not slavishly follow the dictates of one political party. This is a direct threat to freedom of speech and I unhesitatingly condemn such action. To overcome this problem I rely on my readers to share Yours for Scotland articles as widely as possible. My thanks to those who help overcome censorship.

FREE SUBSCRIPTIONS

The most reliable way to get articles from this site is by taking out a free subscription which are available on the Home and Blog pages of the Yours for Scotland website. Given that I often seem to face other problems with both Twitter and Facebook this guarantees that my content is freely available.

SALVO

Salvo continues to do valuable work and an ever increasing number of people are involved. They are now running strong campaigns on several key issues and as the campaigning arm of Liberation.Scot they are the key to success. If you would like to make a donation to further Salvo and Liberation’s campaigning here are the details. All donations large or small greatly helps our work.

Bank RBS

ACCOUNT SALVOSCOT Ltd.

Ac number 00779437

Sort Code 83-22-26

LIBERATION.SCOT

If you have not already joined please visit the above website and join now. We are looking to achieve a membership larger than any other political organisation in Scotland to approach the UN to achieve the official status as Scotland’s Liberation Movement intent of removing the colonising forces from our nation. Be part of it.

15 thoughts on “A DAY OUT IN EDINBURGH.

  1. Well done to all involved. It highlights just how far the current SG has fallen from alignment with the Scottish People in the last decade.

    Liked by 12 people

  2. “Here giant multinational companies are trying to use the law to eliminate Don Staniford speaking out about abuses that his investigations discover.”

    Bravo Ewan and to those in the team. Corporate colonialism has no place in Scotland or anywhere else.

    Liked by 16 people

    1. Aye kudos to you Don, but if we think its bad now just wait until these so called Freeports are up and running.

      Liked by 6 people

  3. Bravo all!

    Freedom of speech in, and movement around our, country should be a protected right of the Scottish people.

    The limits to these rights should not be defined and determined by multinational organisations who exploit and profit from our natural resources.

    Liked by 10 people

  4. Congratulation to all concerned it’s a great result but still not yet total vindication that I hope will come.

    This is just one example of how our rights can be trampled by governments and we are about to witness this all over again with the UK’s freeports, ably supported by Westminster’s administrative body for Scotland at Holyrood – Oh that they were quite so proactive regarding our Right to Self-Determination and independence!

    Why would the ‘Scottish Government’, that we should trust to uphold our rights, protect us as the people of Scotland, and prevent plunder and profiteering, collaborate with our oppressors to deliver their freeports? Most readers will probably be aware of the letter from Kate Forbes MSP to Michael Gove MP on 12 February 2022 but I would guess that 90% of Scots have no idea what is being done in their name.

    For the very few here who may not have seen that collaborative document, I quote, ‘I very much welcome the resumption of joint working between the Scottish and UK Governments, on a partnership basis, to tailor the UK’s freeports programme to the Scottish policy context,’

    When we have an administration in Scotland collaborating with our oppressors over more than 3 centuries, it is long past time that they were removed. I surely cannot ever remember voting to allow freeports and the exploitation of our people, land and seas! So, why has everything to do with these ‘freeports’ been so secretive? Why has only one elected representative turned up at the meetings arranged by Salvo to inform the public what is really going on?

    Compulsory Purchase is sure to follow and yet there is very little information being given to the electorate in the affected areas? Compulsory Purchase cannot happen in Scotland for private concerns unless they are in partnership with an ‘Acquiring Authority’, of which there are very few. I list them for your information: ‘any public service organisation with compulsory purchase powers – including: local authorities and other public service providers; utility companies; Scottish Government Agencies and Non-Departmental Public Bodies; and Network Rail. ‘

    So, it looks as if it will be either the local authorities or the ‘Scottish Government’ to act as partners to these giant corporations. No wonder they are so quiet about freeports.

    Liked by 12 people

    1. I have just stomached 5 mins of questiontime from the lying bbc and listened to a sickeningly fake sweet Kate Forbes obfuscate repeatedly when asked about sturgeon’s missing messages and her non invitations to gold meetings, there was one woman who actually praised sturgeon for her actions during covid , I suspect she was a paypal paul adherent

      Liked by 1 person

  5. That sounds like a great result, and the one outstanding issue will surely also go the way of the appellants. Imagine you are standing close to someone’s garden, or maybe a farm, and you see animals being treated cruelly, who is going to suggest that you have no right to observe what is going on, and report it to all and sundry ?

    Liked by 9 people

  6. There is an organisation in Scotland, SEPA, nominally charged with safeguarding the threat from environmental pollution and in particular water pollution from industrial sources. If, and it is a big IF, that organisation was addressing the responsibilities incumbent within it’s remit there would be absolutely no requirement for Don Staniford or any other person for that matter to expose and challenge the practises of MOWI and other global operators within Scottish waters.

    A quick check on the CV’s of those most recently appointed to the board of directors exposes a complete dearth of knowledge and expertise within the sector and goes a very long way to explaining why those companies are running rings around SEPA and the Scottish Government.

    As with all other failing aspects of Scottish Governance emanating from Holyrood, FOLLOW THE MONEY!!

    Liked by 6 people

    1. SEPA, many will recall, had its computer system hacked. This was after it complained that it was legally restricted from reporting the MOD for multiple breaches at Faslane (Rosyth wasn’t mentioned). It seems strange that a rogue individual or organisation would seek to destroy the files that the UK found embarrassing. Would it not be better to leak them? (no pun intended)

      A similarly puzzling incident took place at Western Isles Council. One cannot image that their files were of interest to Johnny Foreigner. On a personal level, a member of my extended family had much of her work destroyed. This was research into the history of Gaeldom and had involved her in foreign travel. She was not the only individual to lose such work and ‘got off lightly’ in comparison to some.

      Liked by 5 people

      1. So, Westminster’s administration in Scotland, based at Holyrood, is not the only organisation that is not doing the job for which it was mandated.

        Liked by 3 people

      2. Aye Captain, from SEPA’S own site; ‘we were subject to a serious and complex cyber-attack, displaying significant stealth and malicious sophistication’. That sounds awfy like mibbaes somebody ower the water in Amerikay wisnae very happy wi’ them.

        Liked by 3 people

  7. This could become an important precedent with regards to the Freeports. Thanks for this post. I’ll await the outcome with interest. More questions to confront our elected representatives with, after the result which I look forward to hearing about here. I’ll look up the crowd funding link and the other article too.

    Liked by 6 people

Comments are closed.